| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Henry Nelson Wieman''' (1884-1975) is a famous classical [[liberal Christianity|liberal Christian]] theologian and a Unitarian. As a theologian his major achievement is finding an academically satisfying intellecual bridge between faith and knowledge, religion and science, knowledge and ethics, and nature and history. His bridge is religiously [[God|Theistic]] rather than secularly humanistic in nature. This is something that had always eluded other theologians such as those in the [[neo-orthodoxy]] movement. Other theologians have since constructed similar bridges, these later bridges are often thought to be somewhat more sound. These theologians include [[Bernard Meland]], [[John Cobb]], and [[David Ray Griffin]].<ref> ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=VpafCAIMCowC Faith and Knowledge]'', [[Douglas M. Sloan|Douglas Sloan]], , Westminster John Knox Press, 1994, ISBN 0664228666, ISBN 9780664228668, | + | '''Henry Nelson Wieman''' (1884-1975) is a famous classical [[liberal Christianity|liberal Christian]] theologian and a Unitarian. As a theologian his major achievement is finding an academically satisfying intellecual bridge between faith and knowledge, religion and science, knowledge and ethics, and nature and history. His bridge is religiously [[God|Theistic]] rather than secularly humanistic in nature. This is something that had always eluded other theologians such as those in the [[neo-orthodoxy]] movement. Other theologians have since constructed similar bridges, these later bridges are often thought to be somewhat more sound. These theologians include [[Bernard Meland]], [[John Cobb]], and [[David Ray Griffin]].<ref>''[http://books.google.com/books?id=VpafCAIMCowC Faith and Knowledge]'', [[Douglas M. Sloan|Douglas Sloan]], , Westminster John Knox Press, 1994, ISBN 0664228666, ISBN 9780664228668, |
| − | 272 pages, pp. 136-139 </ref> | + | 272 pages, pp. 136-139</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Unlike many 20th century Unitarians who were or became agnostics or atheists, Wieman always maintained and affirmed the existence of [[God]] and His [[transcendence]]. His work is considered to be part of the foundation of [[process theology]], which constructed around the philosophy of [[Alfred North Whitehead]]. His book ''Religious Experience and Scientific Method'' (Macmillan, 1926) was republished in 1971 and is a classic in its field.<ref> [http://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/unitarians/wieman.html Harvardsquare Library] </ref> | + | Unlike many 20th century Unitarians who were or became agnostics or atheists, Wieman always maintained and affirmed the existence of [[God]] and His [[transcendence]]. His work is considered to be part of the foundation of [[process theology]], which constructed around the philosophy of [[Alfred North Whitehead]]. His book ''Religious Experience and Scientific Method'' (Macmillan, 1926) was republished in 1971 and is a classic in its field.<ref>[http://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/unitarians/wieman.html Harvardsquare Library]</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | ===Is John Dewey a theist?===
| + | ==Is John Dewey a theist?== |
| − | Wieman famously interpreted [[John Dewey]]'s thesis of ''A Common Faith'' (1934) as one of [[process theology]]. This led to a ''[[Christian Century]]'' article "Is John Dewey a theist?", which [[John Dewey]] responded to and Wieman eventually took back his original interpretation. Another liberal theologian [[Charles Hartshorne]] has stated that Wieman was correct and that Dewey had in fact expressed a theist argument in ''A Common Faith''.<ref> [http://books.google.com/books?id=LOc6q5lmEj8C&pg=PA524&lpg=PA524&dq=%22Henry+Neslon+Weiman&source=bl&ots=UMGKlGexQt&sig=XUCc4kmyGSjdI8tkKT1Zx03vqtk&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPA525,M1 ''John Dewey: Religious Faith and Democratic Humanism''], Steven C. Rockefeller, Columbia University Press, 1991, ISBN 0231073488, ISBN 9780231073486, pp. 524-525 </ref> | + | Wieman famously interpreted [[John Dewey]]'s thesis of ''A Common Faith'' (1934) as one of [[process theology]]. This led to a ''[[Christian Century]]'' article "Is John Dewey a theist?", which [[John Dewey]] responded to and Wieman eventually took back his original interpretation. Another liberal theologian [[Charles Hartshorne]] has stated that Wieman was correct and that Dewey had in fact expressed a theist argument in ''A Common Faith''.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=LOc6q5lmEj8C&pg=PA524&lpg=PA524&dq=%22Henry+Neslon+Weiman&source=bl&ots=UMGKlGexQt&sig=XUCc4kmyGSjdI8tkKT1Zx03vqtk&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPA525,M1 ''John Dewey: Religious Faith and Democratic Humanism''], Steven C. Rockefeller, Columbia University Press, 1991, ISBN 0231073488, ISBN 9780231073486, pp. 524-525</ref> |
| | | | |
| | {{reflist}} | | {{reflist}} |
| | {{DEFAULTSORT:Wieman, Henry Nelson}} | | {{DEFAULTSORT:Wieman, Henry Nelson}} |
| − | [[Category: Liberals]] | + | [[Category:Liberals]] |
| − | [[Category: Theologians]] | + | [[Category:Theologians]] |
| − | [[Category : Liberal Authors]] | + | [[Category:Liberal Authors]] |