Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
8 bytes removed ,  21:54, June 27, 2016
clean up & uniformity
Line 12: Line 12:  
==The documents==
 
==The documents==
 
The documents are in the form of memos supposedly written by Lieutenant Colonel Jerry B. Killian, which include:
 
The documents are in the form of memos supposedly written by Lieutenant Colonel Jerry B. Killian, which include:
*An order directing Bush to report for a physical examination. <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay4.pdf BushGuardmay4.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
+
*An order directing Bush to report for a physical examination.<ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay4.pdf BushGuardmay4.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
*A note to himself that he had grounded Bush for "failure to perform to USAF/TexANG standards," as well as disobeying orders for the physical exam. <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust1.pdf BushGuardaugust1.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
+
*A note to himself that he had grounded Bush for "failure to perform to USAF/TexANG standards," as well as disobeying orders for the physical exam.<ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust1.pdf BushGuardaugust1.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
*A note to himself of a telephone conversation with Bush. The note records that Bush was working on the campaign of an Alabama senator, and wanted to be excused from his duties. <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay19.pdf BushGuardmay19.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
+
*A note to himself of a telephone conversation with Bush. The note records that Bush was working on the campaign of an Alabama senator, and wanted to be excused from his duties.<ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay19.pdf BushGuardmay19.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
*A note to himself which claimed he had pressure on him from higher up to "sugarcoat" Bush's evaluation report. <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust18.pdf BushGuardaugust18.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
+
*A note to himself which claimed he had pressure on him from higher up to "sugarcoat" Bush's evaluation report.<ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust18.pdf BushGuardaugust18.pdf], [[CBS News]]</ref>
   −
The documents were supplied to CBS news by a former officer in the Texas Air National Guard, Bill Burkett, who stated in interviews earlier in the year that "he overheard a telephone conversation in the spring of 1997 in which top Bush aides asked the head of the Texas National Guard to sanitize Bush's files as he was running for a second term as governor of Texas. Several days later, he said, he saw dozens of pages from Bush's military file dumped in a trash can at Camp Mabry, the Guard's headquarters" <ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24635-2004Sep15.html/ CBS Guard Documents Traced to Tex. Kinko's], by Michael Dobbs, [[Washington Post]], September 16, 2004</ref>.
+
The documents were supplied to CBS news by a former officer in the Texas Air National Guard, Bill Burkett, who stated in interviews earlier in the year that "he overheard a telephone conversation in the spring of 1997 in which top Bush aides asked the head of the Texas National Guard to sanitize Bush's files as he was running for a second term as governor of Texas. Several days later, he said, he saw dozens of pages from Bush's military file dumped in a trash can at Camp Mabry, the Guard's headquarters".<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24635-2004Sep15.html/ CBS Guard Documents Traced to Tex. Kinko's], by Michael Dobbs, [[Washington Post]], September 16, 2004</ref>
    
==Proof of forgery==
 
==Proof of forgery==
 
====Script====
 
====Script====
 
[[Image:Aug1873-pdf-animate.gif|200px|right|thumb|Comparison of one of the Killian documents with a similar document written with the default settings on Microsoft Word]]
 
[[Image:Aug1873-pdf-animate.gif|200px|right|thumb|Comparison of one of the Killian documents with a similar document written with the default settings on Microsoft Word]]
The script used in the document was instantly suspected and first realized to be a forgery by a [[Free Republic|Freeper]] with the username of "Buckhead".<ref>[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/10/15/local_drive_by_anchor_interrogates_mrs_clinton_on_her_e_mails Local Drive-By Anchor Interrogates Mrs. Clinton on Her E-Mails]</ref><ref>[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210662/posts?page=47#47  Documents Suggest Special Treatment for Bush in Guard (Buckhead post 47)]</ref>  Bloggers also picked it up that the font was "Times New Roman", and matched the documents up with the default layout of [[Microsoft Word]].  As to it being a part of the U.S. military, journalist Robert Bluey wrote  "The typography experts couldn't pinpoint the exact font used in the documents. They also couldn't definitively conclude that the documents were either forged using a current computer program or were the work of a high-end typewriter or word processor in the early 1970s.  But the use of the superscript "th" in one document - "111th F.I.S" - gave each expert pause. They said that is an automatic feature found in current versions of Microsoft Word, and it's not something that was even possible more than 30 years ago." <ref>[http://www.cnsnews.com/Politics/archive/200409/POL20040909d.html '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake], By Robert B. Bluey, [[Cybercast News Service]], September 9, 2004]</ref>.  
+
The script used in the document was instantly suspected and first realized to be a forgery by a [[Free Republic|Freeper]] with the username of "Buckhead".<ref>[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/10/15/local_drive_by_anchor_interrogates_mrs_clinton_on_her_e_mails Local Drive-By Anchor Interrogates Mrs. Clinton on Her E-Mails]</ref><ref>[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210662/posts?page=47#47  Documents Suggest Special Treatment for Bush in Guard (Buckhead post 47)]</ref>  Bloggers also picked it up that the font was "Times New Roman", and matched the documents up with the default layout of [[Microsoft Word]].  As to it being a part of the U.S. military, journalist Robert Bluey wrote  "The typography experts couldn't pinpoint the exact font used in the documents. They also couldn't definitively conclude that the documents were either forged using a current computer program or were the work of a high-end typewriter or word processor in the early 1970s.  But the use of the superscript "th" in one document - "111th F.I.S" - gave each expert pause. They said that is an automatic feature found in current versions of Microsoft Word, and it's not something that was even possible more than 30 years ago.".<ref>[http://www.cnsnews.com/Politics/archive/200409/POL20040909d.html '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake], By Robert B. Bluey, [[Cybercast News Service]], September 9, 2004]</ref>   
   −
The standard-issue machine in all branches of the U.S. armed forces for writing documents during the 1960's-1970's was the IBM Selectric and Selectric II typewriters, both of which contain interchangeable fonts on a typeface ball.  So wide-spread was the use of these machines that they were made part of the planned maintenance system in which repairs and upgrades were done by military personnel rather than the factory.  The use of stand-alone word processors and office computers did not appear at military commands until as early as the late 1970s, well after the Killian documents were supposedly written. <ref name=killian>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132047,00.html Fox News interview with Gary Killian]</ref>
+
The standard-issue machine in all branches of the U.S. armed forces for writing documents during the 1960's-1970's was the IBM Selectric and Selectric II typewriters, both of which contain interchangeable fonts on a typeface ball.  So wide-spread was the use of these machines that they were made part of the planned maintenance system in which repairs and upgrades were done by military personnel rather than the factory.  The use of stand-alone word processors and office computers did not appear at military commands until as early as the late 1970s, well after the Killian documents were supposedly written.<ref name=killian>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132047,00.html Fox News interview with Gary Killian]</ref>
    
====Post office box====
 
====Post office box====
Line 37: Line 37:  
Those that tendered their resignations on request were: Senior Vice President Betsy West, the supervisor of primetime programs for CBS News; Josh Howard, the executive producer of Wednesday's version of ''60 Minutes''; Mary Murphy, senior broadcast producer and Howard's deputy.  Mary Mapes, the actual producer of the Killian documents story, was terminated, in part for calling a senior official in John Kerry's presidential campaign (Joe Lockhart) and offering to put him in touch with Burkett.  The CBS panel called Mapes’ action a ''“clear conflict of interest that created the appearance of political bias.”'' <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/10/national/main665727.shtml CBS Ousts 4 For Bush Guard Story], [[CBS News]], January 10, 2005</ref>
 
Those that tendered their resignations on request were: Senior Vice President Betsy West, the supervisor of primetime programs for CBS News; Josh Howard, the executive producer of Wednesday's version of ''60 Minutes''; Mary Murphy, senior broadcast producer and Howard's deputy.  Mary Mapes, the actual producer of the Killian documents story, was terminated, in part for calling a senior official in John Kerry's presidential campaign (Joe Lockhart) and offering to put him in touch with Burkett.  The CBS panel called Mapes’ action a ''“clear conflict of interest that created the appearance of political bias.”'' <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/10/national/main665727.shtml CBS Ousts 4 For Bush Guard Story], [[CBS News]], January 10, 2005</ref>
   −
Unbowed and still convinced of the document's authenticity, Rather filed a $70 million lawsuit against [[CBS]] and its former corporate parent, [[Viacom]] on September 19, 2007, claiming he was made a "scapegoat".<ref>[http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/0919_don_rather_wm_01.pdf Dan Rather -against- CBS Corporation, Viacom, Inc., Leslie Moonves, Sumner Redstone and Andrew Heyward]</ref>  A day later, Mapes wrote a column in the Huffington Post, claiming that far-right blogs have "pronounced themselves experts on document analysis, and began attacking the form and font in the memos. They screamed objections that ultimately proved to have no basis in fact...They dominated the discussion by churning out gigabytes of mind-numbing internet dissertations about the typeface in the memos, focusing on the curl at the end of the "a," the dip on the top of the "t," the spacing, the superscript, which typewriters were used in the military in 1972. It was a deceptive approach, and it worked" <ref>[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-mapes/courage-for-dan-rather_b_65257.html Courage for Dan Rather], by Mary Mapes, [[Huffington Post]]</ref>.
+
Unbowed and still convinced of the document's authenticity, Rather filed a $70 million lawsuit against [[CBS]] and its former corporate parent, [[Viacom]] on September 19, 2007, claiming he was made a "scapegoat".<ref>[http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/0919_don_rather_wm_01.pdf Dan Rather -against- CBS Corporation, Viacom, Inc., Leslie Moonves, Sumner Redstone and Andrew Heyward]</ref>  A day later, Mapes wrote a column in the Huffington Post, claiming that far-right blogs have "pronounced themselves experts on document analysis, and began attacking the form and font in the memos. They screamed objections that ultimately proved to have no basis in fact...They dominated the discussion by churning out gigabytes of mind-numbing internet dissertations about the typeface in the memos, focusing on the curl at the end of the "a," the dip on the top of the "t," the spacing, the superscript, which typewriters were used in the military in 1972. It was a deceptive approach, and it worked".<ref>[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-mapes/courage-for-dan-rather_b_65257.html Courage for Dan Rather], by Mary Mapes, [[Huffington Post]]</ref>
    
====Prior knowledge====
 
====Prior knowledge====
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu