100
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 156:
Line 156: + +
Debate:Is religion morally wrong? (view source)
Revision as of 01:43, April 24, 2007
, 01:43, April 24, 2007→Selective application of logic
::I attempted to derive a definition from Bolly's statement only to appease your pretense of indignation when you accused me of ignoring Bolly's alleged "points". By your reaction, I'm now assuming that you just haven't read the entire argument yet and that you concur, Bolly made no points in the gibberish above. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 13:30, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
::I attempted to derive a definition from Bolly's statement only to appease your pretense of indignation when you accused me of ignoring Bolly's alleged "points". By your reaction, I'm now assuming that you just haven't read the entire argument yet and that you concur, Bolly made no points in the gibberish above. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 13:30, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
My point was that i think that children should be educated about sex and religion at the same age. This is because it is the age where both become major issues for children growing up. Please do explain how this is hard to understand, and how this is a selective application of logic. (I apologise for my poor grammar, it is because i write my line or thought and arguement down the same way i would say it out loud) [[Bolly Ottihw|Bolly Ottihw]] 11:42, 24 April 2007
==Age at which sex education should be taught==
==Age at which sex education should be taught==