Changes

Both pro-life and pro-choice groups seek to get their supporters to use "vanity plates" expressing their political views.  In ''[[Henderson v. Stalder]]'', 407 F.3d 351 (5th Cir. 2005), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that Louisiana's prestige license plate program that offered pro-life plates but not pro-choice plates could not be challenged in federal court.

Both pro-life and pro-choice groups seek to get their supporters to use "vanity plates" expressing their political views.  In ''[[Henderson v. Stalder]]'', 407 F.3d 351 (5th Cir. 2005), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that Louisiana's prestige license plate program that offered pro-life plates but not pro-choice plates could not be challenged in federal court.

In ''[[Hill v. Kemp]]'', 478 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2007), the [[United States]] Court of Appeals for the [[Tenth Circuit]] held that [[Oklahoma]]'s [[pro-life]]<ref>The specialty [[license plate]]s included slogans "Adoption Creates Families" and "Choose Life."</ref> specialty license plate charges are "taxes under State law" for the purposes of the Tax Anti-Injunction Act (TIA) and thus the Court affirmed the district court's dismissal of claims of discrimination in offering the plates.

In ''[[Hill v. Kemp]]'', 478 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2007), the [[United States]] Court of Appeals for the [[Tenth Circuit]] held that [[Oklahoma]]'s [[pro-life]]<ref>The specialty license plates included slogans "Adoption Creates Families" and "Choose Life."</ref> specialty license plate charges are "taxes under State law" for the purposes of the Tax Anti-Injunction Act (TIA) and thus the Court affirmed the district court's dismissal of claims of discrimination in offering the plates.

In ''[[ACLU v. Bredesen]]'', 441 F.3d 370 (6th Cir. 2006),<ref>http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/441/441.F3d.370.04-6393.html </ref> the Court of Appeals for the [[Sixth Circuit]] reviewed the constitutionality of Tennessee's statute making available the purchase of automobile license plates with a "Choose Life" inscription, but not making available the purchase of automobile [[license plate]]s with a "pro-choice" or pro-abortion rights message.

In ''[[ACLU v. Bredesen]]'', 441 F.3d 370 (6th Cir. 2006),<ref>http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/441/441.F3d.370.04-6393.html</ref> the Court of Appeals for the [[Sixth Circuit]] reviewed the constitutionality of Tennessee's statute making available the purchase of automobile license plates with a "Choose Life" inscription, but not making available the purchase of automobile license plates with a "pro-choice" or pro-abortion rights message.

==References==

==References==

<references/>

<references/>

[[Category:Transportation]]

[[Category:Transportation]]