| Line 73: |
Line 73: |
| | ''See also:'' [[Atheism and logic]] and [[Atheism and irrationality]] | | ''See also:'' [[Atheism and logic]] and [[Atheism and irrationality]] |
| | | | |
| − | A common and legitimate criticism of the [[atheist worldview]] is that [[atheism]] is irrational (See: [[Atheism and irrationality]] and [[Atheism and logic]]).<ref>[http://carm.org/cut-atheism Atheism] by Matt Slick | + | A common and legitimate criticism of the [[atheist worldview]] is that atheism is irrational (See: [[Atheism and irrationality]] and [[Atheism and logic]]).<ref>[http://carm.org/cut-atheism Atheism] by Matt Slick |
| | *[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive] by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7. | | *[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive] by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7. |
| | *[http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2012/03/21/atheists-dont-own-reason/10924 Atheists don’t own reason] by Tom Gilson | | *[http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2012/03/21/atheists-dont-own-reason/10924 Atheists don’t own reason] by Tom Gilson |
| Line 100: |
Line 100: |
| | Ideologues who engage in uncritical thinking often are unaware of opposing arguments and actively avoid intellectually engaging with their opponents arguments. | | Ideologues who engage in uncritical thinking often are unaware of opposing arguments and actively avoid intellectually engaging with their opponents arguments. |
| | | | |
| − | In 1990, the [[atheism|atheist]] philosopher [[Michael Martin]] indicated there was a general [[Atheism and apathy|absence of an atheistic response]] to contemporary work in the [[philosophy]] of religion and in jest he indicated that it was his "cross to bear" to respond to [[theism|theistic]] arguments.<ref>''Open Questions: Diverse Thinkers Discuss God, Religion, and Faith'' by Luís F. Rodrigues, page 201</ref> Yet, in 1994, Michael Martin was criticized for his eleventh hour cancellation of his debate with [[Greg Bahnsen]] (see: [[Greg Bahnsen and debate]] and [[Press release after Michael Martin pulled out of Martin-Bahnsen debate|Bahnson-Martin debate press release]]).<ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref><ref>[http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/Bahnsen.htm Bahsen at the Stein debate] by John Frame</ref> | + | In 1990, the atheist philosopher [[Michael Martin]] indicated there was a general [[Atheism and apathy|absence of an atheistic response]] to contemporary work in the [[philosophy]] of religion and in jest he indicated that it was his "cross to bear" to respond to [[theism|theistic]] arguments.<ref>''Open Questions: Diverse Thinkers Discuss God, Religion, and Faith'' by Luís F. Rodrigues, page 201</ref> Yet, in 1994, Michael Martin was criticized for his eleventh hour cancellation of his debate with [[Greg Bahnsen]] (see: [[Greg Bahnsen and debate]] and [[Press release after Michael Martin pulled out of Martin-Bahnsen debate|Bahnson-Martin debate press release]]).<ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref><ref>[http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/Bahnsen.htm Bahsen at the Stein debate] by John Frame</ref> |
| | | | |
| | == Atheism, debates and critical thinking == | | == Atheism, debates and critical thinking == |
| Line 120: |
Line 120: |
| | [[Postmodernism]] is an [[antichristian]],<ref>John F. MacArthur, "Think Biblically!"[http://books.google.ca/books?id=TLHM6mM1KkYC]</ref> far-left, 20th century [[worldview]] and [[academic]] movement characterized by denial of [[objective]] truth, and which [[stolen concept|asserts]] that assertions of objective knowledge are essentially impossible. | | [[Postmodernism]] is an [[antichristian]],<ref>John F. MacArthur, "Think Biblically!"[http://books.google.ca/books?id=TLHM6mM1KkYC]</ref> far-left, 20th century [[worldview]] and [[academic]] movement characterized by denial of [[objective]] truth, and which [[stolen concept|asserts]] that assertions of objective knowledge are essentially impossible. |
| | | | |
| − | The [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[Norman Geisler]] wrote about postmodernism: "In short, the root of Post-modernism is [[atheism]] and the fruit of it is [[relativism]] — relativism in every area of life and thought."<ref>[http://normangeisler.com/a-response-to-philosophical-postmodernism-2/ A Response to Philosophical Postmodernism] by [[Norman Geisler|Norman L. Geisler]]</ref> Furthermore, Jeff Myers and David A. Noebel note in their book ''Understanding the Times: A Survey of Competing Worldviews'' that "The [[British Broadcasting Corporation]] actually lists postmodernism as a subset of atheism."<ref>Understanding the Times: A Survey of Competing Worldviews By Jeff Myers and David A. Noebel, page 192 (endnote section)</ref> | + | The [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[Norman Geisler]] wrote about postmodernism: "In short, the root of Post-modernism is atheism and the fruit of it is [[relativism]] — relativism in every area of life and thought."<ref>[http://normangeisler.com/a-response-to-philosophical-postmodernism-2/ A Response to Philosophical Postmodernism] by [[Norman Geisler|Norman L. Geisler]]</ref> Furthermore, Jeff Myers and David A. Noebel note in their book ''Understanding the Times: A Survey of Competing Worldviews'' that "The [[British Broadcasting Corporation]] actually lists postmodernism as a subset of atheism."<ref>Understanding the Times: A Survey of Competing Worldviews By Jeff Myers and David A. Noebel, page 192 (endnote section)</ref> |
| | | | |
| | As far as [[Schools of atheist thought|schools of atheist thought]], there are atheists who subscribe to [[modernism]] and atheists who subscribe to postmodernism (See: [[Atheism and postmodernism]]).<ref>[https://www.mdc.edu/wolfson/Academic/ArtsLetters/art_philosophy/Humanities/history_of_modernism.htm History of Modernism], Miami Dade College</ref> Atheists such as [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Steven Novella]], are critical of postmodernism.<ref>[http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/dawkins.html Postmodernism disrobed] by Richard Dawkins</ref><ref>[http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/postmodernism-sophisticated-nonsense/ Postmodernism – Sophisticated Nonsense] by Steven Novella</ref> See also: [[Atheist factions]] | | As far as [[Schools of atheist thought|schools of atheist thought]], there are atheists who subscribe to [[modernism]] and atheists who subscribe to postmodernism (See: [[Atheism and postmodernism]]).<ref>[https://www.mdc.edu/wolfson/Academic/ArtsLetters/art_philosophy/Humanities/history_of_modernism.htm History of Modernism], Miami Dade College</ref> Atheists such as [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Steven Novella]], are critical of postmodernism.<ref>[http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/dawkins.html Postmodernism disrobed] by Richard Dawkins</ref><ref>[http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/postmodernism-sophisticated-nonsense/ Postmodernism – Sophisticated Nonsense] by Steven Novella</ref> See also: [[Atheist factions]] |
| Line 165: |
Line 165: |
| | Uncritical thinking is often a result of arrogance, self-centeredness, self-deception and poor character development. Self-satisfied know-it-alls frequently do poor research and engage in sloppy reasoning. In short, pride comes before the fall. | | Uncritical thinking is often a result of arrogance, self-centeredness, self-deception and poor character development. Self-satisfied know-it-alls frequently do poor research and engage in sloppy reasoning. In short, pride comes before the fall. |
| | | | |
| − | One of the common and well-founded charges against [[atheism|atheists]] is their arrogance and presumptuousness (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]]).<ref> | + | One of the common and well-founded charges against atheists is their arrogance and presumptuousness (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]]).<ref> |
| | *[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive] by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7. | | *[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive] by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7. |
| | *[http://www.equip.org/articles/the-presumptuousness-of-atheism/ The Presumptuousness of Atheism] by Paul Copan, Christian Research Institute | | *[http://www.equip.org/articles/the-presumptuousness-of-atheism/ The Presumptuousness of Atheism] by Paul Copan, Christian Research Institute |
| Line 248: |
Line 248: |
| | {{reflist|2}} | | {{reflist|2}} |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category: Atheism]] | + | [[Category:Atheism]] |
| − | [[Category: Philosophy]] | + | [[Category:Philosophy]] |
| − | [[Category: Logic]] | + | [[Category:Logic]] |