Its main use is in [[criminal]] [[law]], where an acquittal is the finding that a defendant is "not guilty." This means only that the prosecution has been unable to prove that there was sufficient evidence to prove beyond a [[reasonable doubt]] that the defendant committed the crime for which he was charged. It should not be viewed as proof of the defendant's innocence. This fact has created anomalies where a person has been not guilty of a crime, may still be held civilly responsible for the act. The most notable case in which this occurred was in the OJ Simpson murder trial where he was found not guilty of the murder of his wife, but found responsible for her death in a civil wrongful death judgment <ref>[http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=94696&page=1 O.J. Simpson Appeals Civil Suit Verdict]</ref>. The anomaly is created due to the differing standards of proof required between civil and criminal jurisdictions (on the [[Preponderance of the evidence]] vs [[beyond reasonable doubt]]). | Its main use is in [[criminal]] [[law]], where an acquittal is the finding that a defendant is "not guilty." This means only that the prosecution has been unable to prove that there was sufficient evidence to prove beyond a [[reasonable doubt]] that the defendant committed the crime for which he was charged. It should not be viewed as proof of the defendant's innocence. This fact has created anomalies where a person has been not guilty of a crime, may still be held civilly responsible for the act. The most notable case in which this occurred was in the OJ Simpson murder trial where he was found not guilty of the murder of his wife, but found responsible for her death in a civil wrongful death judgment <ref>[http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=94696&page=1 O.J. Simpson Appeals Civil Suit Verdict]</ref>. The anomaly is created due to the differing standards of proof required between civil and criminal jurisdictions (on the [[Preponderance of the evidence]] vs [[beyond reasonable doubt]]). |