Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Social: info added
Line 264: Line 264:  
|2014
 
|2014
 
|TV MA
 
|TV MA
|Another [[homosexual agenda|homosexual propaganda]] film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology.  The GLBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists its artful, when really it is decadent.  
+
|Another [[homosexual agenda|homosexual propaganda]] film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology.  The GLBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists it is "artful", when really it is decadent.  
 
|N/A
 
|N/A
 
|-
 
|-
Line 270: Line 270:  
|2010
 
|2010
 
|R
 
|R
|Film about homosexual poet, [[Allen Ginsberg]].  Promotes the homosexual agenda and the idea that writing about [[pornography]] is protected under the [[First Amendment]] and has literary value.
+
|Film about homosexual poet and [[beatnik]]-turned-[[hippie]], [[Allen Ginsberg]].  Promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and the idea that writing about [[pornography]] is protected under the [[First Amendment]] and has literary value.
 
|$617,334
 
|$617,334
 
|-
 
|-
Line 330: Line 330:  
|2000
 
|2000
 
|R
 
|R
|The film is about a boy who wants to be a ballet dancer rather than play sports. Very poor family values shown as the family is constantly cursing at one another, it also promotes homosexuality
+
|The film is about a boy who wants to be a ballet dancer rather than play sports. Very poor family values shown as the family is constantly cursing at one another, it also promotes homosexuality.
 
|$21,995,263
 
|$21,995,263
 
|-
 
|-
Line 342: Line 342:  
|2013
 
|2013
 
|R
 
|R
|Egregiously supports the homosexual agenda  
+
|Egregiously supports the homosexual agenda.
 
|$27,298,285
 
|$27,298,285
 
|-
 
|-
Line 390: Line 390:  
|2004
 
|2004
 
|PG-13
 
|PG-13
|Overdramatic, nonsensical portrayal of the consequences of fictional [[climate change]].
+
|Overdramatic, nonsensical portrayal of the consequences of fictional "[[climate change]]".
 
|$186,740,799
 
|$186,740,799
 
|-
 
|-
Line 414: Line 414:  
|2014
 
|2014
 
|NR
 
|NR
|This two part movie features 4 hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict.  It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&M, in a positive light.  In general, this film was labeled as NSFW.  Director, Lars von Trier, is known for being Anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.
+
|This two part movie features four hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict.  It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&M, in a positive light.  In general, this film was labeled as NSFW.  Director, Lars von Trier, is known for being Anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.
 
|$17,584,083
 
|$17,584,083
 
|-
 
|-
Line 438: Line 438:  
|2013
 
|2013
 
|NC-17
 
|NC-17
|French film that promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and graphically shows lesbian sex.  Additionally, it falsely idealizes the idea that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children.  At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included [[Brokeback Mountain]] director, Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize.  It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[homosexual marriage]] eight days prior. At least one of the stars for the film admitted that she felt disgusted by her role in it.
+
|French film that promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and graphically shows lesbian sex.  Additionally, it falsely idealizes the idea that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children.  At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' director, Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize.  It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex "marriage"]] eight days prior. At least one of the stars for the film admitted that she felt disgusted by her role in it.
 
|$2,199,787
 
|$2,199,787
 
|-
 
|-
Line 444: Line 444:  
|2005
 
|2005
 
|PG-13
 
|PG-13
|Promotes [[homosexuality]] and transvestitism as normal lifestyle.  
+
|Promotes [[homosexuality]] and transvestitism as "normal" lifestyle.  
 
|$29,077,547
 
|$29,077,547
 
|-
 
|-
Line 450: Line 450:  
|1972
 
|1972
 
|NC-17
 
|NC-17
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiallity]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light.  This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language, one character is even named after a racial slur against white people.  Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing.  A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close ups of genitalia unlike any non porno film.  Liberals call it a comedy, but it is more like an act of [[Satan]].
+
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiallity]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light.  This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character (Divine) literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language, one character is even named after a racial slur against white people.  Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing.  A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close ups of genitalia unlike any non-porno film.  Liberals call it a comedy, but it is more like an act of [[Satan]].
 
|$7,000,000
 
|$7,000,000
 
|-
 
|-
Line 462: Line 462:  
|2013
 
|2013
 
|R
 
|R
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme.  Furthermore, this film promotes feminism and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as weak and insecure.
+
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme.  Furthermore, this film promotes feminism and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as "weak" and "insecure".
 
|$31,724,284
 
|$31,724,284
 
|-
 
|-
Line 516: Line 516:  
|1983
 
|1983
 
|Not Rated
 
|Not Rated
|Attacks the military and conservative politicians, and encourages negotiation with communists.
+
|Attacks the military and conservative politicians, and encourages negotiation with Communists.
 
|NA - TV
 
|NA - TV
 
|-
 
|-
Line 600: Line 600:  
|2007
 
|2007
 
|R
 
|R
|Promotes feminism and glorifies Satanism, contains a lesbian kiss and them making out
+
|Promotes feminism and glorifies Satanism, contains a lesbian kiss and them making out.
 
|$16,204,793.
 
|$16,204,793.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 642: Line 642:  
|2003
 
|2003
 
|R
 
|R
|Lots of coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and also the main plot involved a conman posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, to be disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside Kill Bill.
+
|Lots of coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and also the main plot involved a conman posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, to be disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''.
 
|$60 million
 
|$60 million
 
|-
 
|-
Line 730: Line 730:  
|1969
 
|1969
 
|R
 
|R
|Glorifies every aspect of the hippie lifestyle, and is also anti-America. Portrays conservatives as bigoted rednecks.
+
|Glorifies every aspect of the hippie lifestyle, and is also anti-America. Portrays conservatives as "bigoted" rednecks.
 
|$60 million
 
|$60 million
 
|-
 
|-
Line 742: Line 742:  
|2002
 
|2002
 
|
 
|
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie which also portrays Christians as hateful bigots. Has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies, even among homosexuals. Even Wikipedia acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page "List of movies considered the worst".
+
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie which also portrays Christians as "hateful bigots". Has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies, even among homosexuals. Even Wikipedia acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page "List of movies considered the worst".
 
|$40,000
 
|$40,000
 
|-
 
|-
Line 748: Line 748:  
|2001
 
|2001
 
|R
 
|R
|Contains a lot of crude sexual humor, including a scene where the main character actually makes a horse masturbate. Uses shock tactics in much the same way that Family Guy does. Won 5 Razzie awards, including Worst Picture.
+
|Contains a lot of crude sexual humor, including a scene where the main character actually makes a horse masturbate. Uses shock tactics in much the same way that ''Family Guy'' does. Won five Razzie awards, including Worst Picture.
 
|$14.3 million
 
|$14.3 million
 
|}
 
|}
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846

edits

Navigation menu