Changes

|-

|-

| style="padding:15px;" | ''[We can observe] the emergence of “new human rights” which, not being generally recognized as such, in fact stand in radical contradiction to “traditional” ethical and cultural values; and, consequently, are also in conflict with the existing domestic legislation and jurisprudence in most countries. They bespeak a “fourth generation” of human rights which, unlike the second and third generations, do not build on the first generation of “civil liberties” and complement them with social and economic entitlements, but are of a truly revolutionary nature: '''what was once considered a crime is to be transformed into a right''', and '''what was once considered justice, into a human rights violation'''.{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter."'' Isaiah 5:20 Holy Bible, New International Version^®, NIV^® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.^® |group=note}}''

| style="padding:15px;" | ''[We can observe] the emergence of “new human rights” which, not being generally recognized as such, in fact stand in radical contradiction to “traditional” ethical and cultural values; and, consequently, are also in conflict with the existing domestic legislation and jurisprudence in most countries. They bespeak a “fourth generation” of human rights which, unlike the second and third generations, do not build on the first generation of “civil liberties” and complement them with social and economic entitlements, but are of a truly revolutionary nature: '''what was once considered a crime is to be transformed into a right''', and '''what was once considered justice, into a human rights violation'''.{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter."'' Isaiah 5:20 Holy Bible, New International Version^®, NIV^® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.^® |group=note}}''

<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash;Jakob Cornides<ref>{{cite web |title= Natural and  Un-Natural Law |author=Jakob Cornides |year=2009 |publisher=INternational Law Group Organizations |url=http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=jakob_cornides |accessdate=3 September 2015}}</ref> </div>

<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash;Jakob Cornides<ref>{{cite web |title= Natural and  Un-Natural Law |author=Jakob Cornides |year=2009 |publisher=International Law Group Organizations |url=http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=jakob_cornides |accessdate=3 September 2015}}</ref> </div>

|}

|}

In the course of few decades the radical homosexual activists have managed to adopt the terminology of human rights<ref name="MarshallAtCNN">{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |author=Bob Marshall |publisher=CNN |url=http://youtu.be/WwNJjPr4NP4 |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil right. It’s not the same as a civil rights movement, … sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It’s a pattern of behavior.” |accessdate=20 Feb 2016}}</ref> in order to make the way for their particular interests hence depriving the human rights of their true content.<ref name="Kuby">{{cite book

In the course of few decades the radical homosexual activists have managed to adopt the terminology of human rights<ref name="MarshallAtCNN">{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |author=Bob Marshall |publisher=CNN |url=http://youtu.be/WwNJjPr4NP4 |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil right. It’s not the same as a civil rights movement, … sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It’s a pattern of behavior.” |accessdate=20 Feb 2016}}</ref> in order to make the way for their particular interests hence depriving the human rights of their true content.<ref name="Kuby">{{cite book

|author=Gabriele Kuby

|author=Gabriele Kuby

|url=

|url=

|language=Slovak

|language=Slovak

}}</ref> LGBTI campaigners have been using the language of rights<ref name="Sprigg2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BC07I01 |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). The |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref> in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’ |accessdate=11 October 2015}}</ref>

}}</ref> LGBTI campaigners have been using the language of rights<ref name="Sprigg2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BC07I01 |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). The |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref> in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. ‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law. ‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’ He added: ‘The ruling from the ECHR will embolden those whose concerns about same-sex marriage and adoption are not inspired by personal hatred and animosity, but by a genuine concern for the well-being of children and the welfare of society. ‘Instead of rushing to legislate without seriously considering the views of the electorate, the Government should be encouraging a measured public debate on the nature and meaning of marriage.’ |accessdate=11 October 2015}}</ref> In [[Roman law]] this type of judicial activity made for the purpose of fullfiling the sensual lust and sexual bodily urges was titled ''Libidinis causa''. The legal causes outwardly pretending the just cause but in fact hiding the real intentions and will of their originators were termed in [[Latin]] as ''Dissimulatio'' and Servius (Ulp. D.4,3,1,2) labeled them as [[deception]] (''dolorum malum'').<ref>{{cite book |author=Karol Rebro |title=Latinské právnicke výrazy a výroky |publisher=Iura edition |year=1995 |page=100-1, 173 |isbn=80-88715-20-2 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=I54hPQAACAAJ |quote=za účelom žiadostivosti, zmyselnosti |language=Slovak}}</ref> [[Francis Bacon]] regarded as negative phenomenon the dissimulation when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is; and called as simulation the situation when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be, that he is not.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-7.html |author=Francis Bacon |title=Essays of Francis Bacon:Of Simulation and Dissimulation |quote=There be three degrees of this hiding and veiling of a man’s self. The first, closeness, reservation, and secrecy; when a man leaveth himself without observation, or without hold to be taken, what he is. The second, dissimulation, in the negative; when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not, that he is. And the third, simulation, in the affirmative; when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be, that he is not. |accessdate=9 Jul 2016}}</ref>  

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>  

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>  

*the term can be used as the semantic equivalent of “racist,” helping the “gay” movement further indoctrinate the public with the notion that opposition to homosexuality is equivalent to prejudice against racial minorities

*the term can be used as the semantic equivalent of “racist,” helping the “gay” movement further indoctrinate the public with the notion that opposition to homosexuality is equivalent to prejudice against racial minorities

*collectively, the word “homophobia” serves pro-“gay” advocates to intimidate opponents into silence.  

*collectively, the word “homophobia” serves pro-“gay” advocates to intimidate opponents into silence.  

When any expression of opposition to homosexuality alias sodomy draws the accusation that one is a mentally-ill bigot equivalent to a racist, few people will venture to express their opposition to sodomical lifestyle publicly. Those who still will do, will also tend to be defensive, offering the disclaimer that they are not hateful, thus unintentionally but implicitly validating the lie that hatefulness and not valid objections is the general rule. The solution countering this LGBTI gleichschaltung is to reject the term “homophobia” itself as harmful and illegitimate. Its illegitimacy can be exposed by making the "gay" sophists define the term with emphasis on the distinction between "homophobia" and non-homophobic opposition to sodomical lifestyle based on presenting valid arguments, such as, for example, scientific [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style|thought experiments]]. They will reveal that they accept no opposition to their agenda as legitimate.{{#tag:ref|The “gays” outrageous mistreatment of Miss California 2009, [[Carrie Prejean]], for simply giving her opinion that [[marriage]] should be between a man and a woman is illustrative of this fact.|group=note}}

When any expression of opposition to homosexuality alias sodomy draws the accusation that one is a mentally-ill bigot equivalent to a racist, few people will venture to express their opposition to sodomical lifestyle publicly. Those who still will do, will also tend to be defensive, offering the disclaimer that they are not hateful, thus unintentionally but implicitly validating the lie that hatefulness and not valid objections is the general rule. The solution countering this LGBTI gleichschaltung is to reject the term “homophobia” itself as harmful and illegitimate. Its illegitimacy can be exposed by making the "gay" sophists define the term with emphasis on the distinction between "homophobia" and non-homophobic opposition to sodomical lifestyle based on presenting valid arguments, such as, for example, scientific [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style|thought experiments]]. They will reveal that they accept no opposition to their agenda as legitimate.{{#tag:ref|The “gays” outrageous mistreatment of Miss California 2009, [[Carrie Prejean]], for simply giving her opinion that [[marriage]] should be between a man and a woman is illustrative of this fact.|group=note}}