Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Evolution two (view source)
Revision as of 12:49, April 24, 2007
, 12:49, April 24, 2007→Suggestions
# One of the main things that really bothers me about the [[Theory of evolution]] page is the "Further Reading (including free on-line versions)" section. As of 4-04-07 every one of the books listed has an anti-evolution slant to them. For the article to be truly balanced I believe that there needs to be an equal amount of pro-evolution books listed. [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 01:36, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
# One of the main things that really bothers me about the [[Theory of evolution]] page is the "Further Reading (including free on-line versions)" section. As of 4-04-07 every one of the books listed has an anti-evolution slant to them. For the article to be truly balanced I believe that there needs to be an equal amount of pro-evolution books listed. [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 01:36, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:There will be a section of works on each. For example, pro-evolution will have a listing of works by Stephen Jay Gould, Bob Bakker, Darwin, Huxley, etc, and the creation will have works by Morris, Gish, and others. As much as possible I want to see works done by those who are clear experts in the field, and which can be found in many libraries across the country. If there are sources which are not used, then a "for further reading" section will be added. Such standards will also include links.
:I'm also going to avoid the "pro-" or "anti-" words as well; they each involve a negative as well as a personal tone, and we have to be as neutral as possible. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 08:49, 24 April 2007 (EDT)