999
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: +
→Current Alerts
*{{user|CaptainCAVEMAN}} ought to be blocked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 10:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
*{{user|CaptainCAVEMAN}} ought to be blocked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 10:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
*{{user|Hacker}} Review of Hacker's edits: slightly less than 500 edits, of which only about 6 are new entries and only about 10 are substantive edits of existing entries. One of the new entries was "Geek". Unless this improves quickly, I propose blocking this account because this violates the 90/10 rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
*{{user|Hacker}} Review of Hacker's edits: slightly less than 500 edits, of which only about 6 are new entries and only about 10 are substantive edits of existing entries. One of the new entries was "Geek". Unless this improves quickly, I propose blocking this account because this violates the 90/10 rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
::That seems disingenuous. Yes, he has only a few new pages, but he has made a number of templates. And, maybe I read the "total" incorrectly, but it said 307 edits? At the risk of sounding tautological, this user is quite useful, IMHO. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 10:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
*{{user|Rvm}} first edit was reverted by MountainDew (I mean DanH). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:44, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
*{{user|Rvm}} first edit was reverted by MountainDew (I mean DanH). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:44, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
*{{user|Vossy}} created a weird article which someone else immediately blanked. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:22, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
*{{user|Vossy}} created a weird article which someone else immediately blanked. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:22, 18 April 2007 (EDT)