Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
7 bytes removed ,  05:47, July 12, 2016
→‎top: clean up & uniformity
Line 4: Line 4:  
What is unique is the way it was used ''en masse'' and with tactical brilliance by English commanders during the 14th and into the 15th centuries, and the discipline and training of the archers - an Anglo-Welsh yeoman archer of the time was trained to loose an arrow, generally 32" long, up to 250 yards, with a good deal of accuracy, at a rate of between 6 and 10 arrows a minute. This is a rate of fire not exceeded until the first repeating rifles of the 19th century.  
 
What is unique is the way it was used ''en masse'' and with tactical brilliance by English commanders during the 14th and into the 15th centuries, and the discipline and training of the archers - an Anglo-Welsh yeoman archer of the time was trained to loose an arrow, generally 32" long, up to 250 yards, with a good deal of accuracy, at a rate of between 6 and 10 arrows a minute. This is a rate of fire not exceeded until the first repeating rifles of the 19th century.  
   −
It should be noted that bow quality changed over time and all longbows were not the same. Recovered longbows from the time of [[Henry VIII]] have draw weights ranging from 120-200lb, far beyond the capabilities of most modern archers or bowhunters, but by this time there were frequent complaints that England's archers were far weaker than they had been during the [[Hundred Years' War]]. While the longbow lacked range compared to Asian composite bows it was capable of launching a much heavier arrow, which gave it a far greater ability to penetrate armor. In fact, at short range, an arrow from a longbow could penetrate 4 inches of seasoned [[oak]].<ref>http://www.archers.org/default.asp?section=History&page=longbow</ref> In addition, its simple design made it much faster to shoot. The longbow proved to be a devastating weapon in the hands of English archers, who demonstrated enormous success against armies with significantly greater numbers of troops.  Good examples of this were the [[Battle of Crecy]] and the [[Battle of Agincourt]] during the [[Hundred Years War]] where heavily armored French [[knight|knights]] were unable to maneuver effectively and suffered prolonged exposure to withering longbow fire.
+
It should be noted that bow quality changed over time and all longbows were not the same. Recovered longbows from the time of [[Henry VIII]] have draw weights ranging from 120-200lb, far beyond the capabilities of most modern archers or bowhunters, but by this time there were frequent complaints that England's archers were far weaker than they had been during the [[Hundred Years' War]]. While the longbow lacked range compared to Asian composite bows it was capable of launching a much heavier arrow, which gave it a far greater ability to penetrate armor. In fact, at short range, an arrow from a longbow could penetrate 4 inches of seasoned [[oak]].<ref>http://www.archers.org/default.asp?section=History&page=longbow</ref> In addition, its simple design made it much faster to shoot. The longbow proved to be a devastating weapon in the hands of English archers, who demonstrated enormous success against armies with significantly greater numbers of troops.  Good examples of this were the [[Battle of Crecy]] and the [[Battle of Agincourt]] during the [[Hundred Years War]] where heavily armored French [[knight]]s were unable to maneuver effectively and suffered prolonged exposure to withering longbow fire.
     
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu