53
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + +
no edit summary
has been removed. People are not born homosexual as they are born a certain race or sex, and we will be happy to destroy any [[junk science]] citations that make that claim. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:36, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
has been removed. People are not born homosexual as they are born a certain race or sex, and we will be happy to destroy any [[junk science]] citations that make that claim. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:36, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:The issue of whether people are born homosexual or not does not affect the fundamental similarities between discrimination in terms of gender, race and sexuality. If you want to make an argument for why discrimination based on sexuality is o.k, where as the other two are not, then go ahead and make it and we can discuss whether your right. Otherwise, don't confuse the issues. [[User:Orgone|Orgone]] 12:42, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:The issue of whether people are born homosexual or not does not affect the fundamental similarities between discrimination in terms of gender, race and sexuality. If you want to make an argument for why discrimination based on sexuality is o.k, where as the other two are not, then go ahead and make it and we can discuss whether your right. Otherwise, don't confuse the issues. [[User:Orgone|Orgone]] 12:42, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:The question of whether one is born homosexual is certainly not a settled matter, in EITHER direction. Your claims of junk science not withstanding. Still, as Orgone points out it is immaterial to the comparison. Would you not consider discrimination against someone based on their religion to be "akin to racism and sexism"? One is not "born Catholic" for example, one has to choose it... how is that any different from your argument? [[User:QNA|QNA]] 13:01, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
==Deletions?==
==Deletions?==