240
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + + + + +
Debate:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements? (view source)
Revision as of 17:08, April 24, 2007
, 17:08, April 24, 2007→Yes: bullying
Furthermore i think the 90%/10% rule is used here mostly to shut up the people presenting inconvient questions or atleast scare them to be quiet. and i think examples from that are plenty. Most reasent in my opinnion is Mr. Aschlafly:s response to Hacker at his talk page regarding the series of questions Hacker made. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 10:00, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Furthermore i think the 90%/10% rule is used here mostly to shut up the people presenting inconvient questions or atleast scare them to be quiet. and i think examples from that are plenty. Most reasent in my opinnion is Mr. Aschlafly:s response to Hacker at his talk page regarding the series of questions Hacker made. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 10:00, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
See [[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deceit&diff=119239&oldid=119227| this edit]] to which the response was:
:"Catwatcher, you've been warned before. This time I see that defaced my entry on deceit. This is not Wikipedia. Ideological, unjustified edits like that will result in blocking your account.--Aschlafly 17:58, 20 April 2007 (EDT) "
and [[User talk:Aschlafly#Response_to_accusations_of_ideology | and my reply]] which resulted in a three day ban. The ban was ostensibly for "sarcasm", the reason being that I claimed not to know any liberals. Actually this is true. I live in Britain, and we do not have the same liberal/conservative split which seems to underpin this wiki (in fact its hard to tell these days who is on what side of the political divide!) We have Liberal Democrats, who are a different kind of liberal, and not the same as U.S. liberals. I was actually doing what I usually do in debate, that is playing [[devil's advocate]], and I did not deserve a ban, much less a threat to have my account blocked. I did not get a chance to say any of the above, as the ban was imposed with immediate effect. In Britain, if such behaviour occurred in the workplace or school, we would call it bullying. That statement will now probably get me another ban or, more probably, a block; but there you go, that's conservapedia --[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 13:08, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
==No==
==No==