Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
Talk:Harvard abortion study (view source)
Revision as of 17:09, April 24, 2007
, 17:09, April 24, 2007no edit summary
Wow. This article reaches levels of ridiculousness I thought were unobtainable. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 12:54, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Wow. This article reaches levels of ridiculousness I thought were unobtainable. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 12:54, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
: Colin, I almost blocked your account for that remark. This is a serious effort and I suggest you baseless attack before I have to.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:Assuming you mean the original article reporting the study, I agree completely. Rarely have a seen a more blatant example of [[junk science]]. You can't exclude people who die of breast cancer, from a study on breast cancer! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:06, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:Assuming you mean the original article reporting the study, I agree completely. Rarely have a seen a more blatant example of [[junk science]]. You can't exclude people who die of breast cancer, from a study on breast cancer! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:06, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
How about a link to the actual study so we can draw our own conclusions instead of reading Andy's slanted opinions? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:08, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
How about a link to the actual study so we can draw our own conclusions instead of reading Andy's slanted opinions? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:08, 24 April 2007 (EDT)