| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | The '''Fourth Great Awakening''' was a religious awakening that some scholars, notably economic historian Robert Fogel, discern in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. The terminology is controversial—many historians believe that the religious changes that took place during these years in the U.S. were not part of an "awakening," to be understood like the first three [[Great Awakening]]s. Thus, the idea of a Fourth Great Awakening itself has not been generally accepted.<ref>Fogel 2000 </ref> This article covers recent American religious history. | + | The '''Fourth Great Awakening''' was a religious awakening that some scholars, notably economic historian Robert Fogel, discern in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. The terminology is controversial—many historians believe that the religious changes that took place during these years in the U.S. were not part of an "awakening," to be understood like the first three [[Great Awakening]]s. Thus, the idea of a Fourth Great Awakening itself has not been generally accepted.<ref>Fogel 2000</ref> This article covers recent American religious history. |
| | ==Trends== | | ==Trends== |
| | Religion has shown great resilience in the face of secularizing pressures. Notable examples include the proliferation of mega-churches, the insurgence of populist denominations such as the Assemblies of God, the Latter-day Saints, and the Southern Baptists, and the post-World War II influence of three world-historical religious leaders: Martin Luther King Jr., Billy Graham, and Pope John Paul II. Mega-churches won attention for the simple reason that 10 churches with 2,000 members were more visible than 100 churches with 200 members. The populist denominations’ growth coincided with the simultaneous decline of the mainline bodies. While the former trend did not come at the expense of the latter (it represented different fertility and retention rates, not switching), to the media and many ordinary observers those developments signaled the aggressive swelling of religious strength. Finally, it would be hard to find any other period of U.S. history that witnessed three leaders who captured the hearts and minds of millions of Americans as King, Graham, and John Paul did. | | Religion has shown great resilience in the face of secularizing pressures. Notable examples include the proliferation of mega-churches, the insurgence of populist denominations such as the Assemblies of God, the Latter-day Saints, and the Southern Baptists, and the post-World War II influence of three world-historical religious leaders: Martin Luther King Jr., Billy Graham, and Pope John Paul II. Mega-churches won attention for the simple reason that 10 churches with 2,000 members were more visible than 100 churches with 200 members. The populist denominations’ growth coincided with the simultaneous decline of the mainline bodies. While the former trend did not come at the expense of the latter (it represented different fertility and retention rates, not switching), to the media and many ordinary observers those developments signaled the aggressive swelling of religious strength. Finally, it would be hard to find any other period of U.S. history that witnessed three leaders who captured the hearts and minds of millions of Americans as King, Graham, and John Paul did. |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | The "mainstream" Protestant churches contracted sharply in terms of membership and influence. | | The "mainstream" Protestant churches contracted sharply in terms of membership and influence. |
| | | | |
| − | The most anti-modern religious denominations (such as the Southern Baptists and Missouri Synod Lutherans) grew rapidly in numbers, spread nationwide, became politically powerful as part of the "religious right", and experienced grave internal theological battles and schisms. Other evangelical and fundamentalist denominations also expanded rapidly, such as the Church of God, Pentacostals, holiness groups and Nazarenes. At the same time, secularism (people with no religious affiliation) grew dramatically, and the more conservative churches saw themselves battling secularism in terms of issues such as gay rights, abortion, and creationism. <ref>McLoughlin 1978, Balmer 2001</ref> | + | The most anti-modern religious denominations (such as the Southern Baptists and Missouri Synod Lutherans) grew rapidly in numbers, spread nationwide, became politically powerful as part of the "religious right", and experienced grave internal theological battles and schisms. Other evangelical and fundamentalist denominations also expanded rapidly, such as the Church of God, Pentacostals, holiness groups and Nazarenes. At the same time, secularism (people with no religious affiliation) grew dramatically, and the more conservative churches saw themselves battling secularism in terms of issues such as gay rights, abortion, and creationism.<ref>McLoughlin 1978, Balmer 2001</ref> |
| | ==Interest== | | ==Interest== |
| | Religion has been playing a much more active role in the nation’s public life. Though religion always had served as a powerful force in the nation’s affairs, in the past fifty years—from the charged 1960 election forward—religious people started to vote in such predictable ways that the mainstream media began to pay them serious attention. In addition, to many thoughtful—and some not so thoughtful—observers, the emergence of the Christian Right in the 1970s and the religious forces behind 9/11 seemed especially conspicuous and alarming. | | Religion has been playing a much more active role in the nation’s public life. Though religion always had served as a powerful force in the nation’s affairs, in the past fifty years—from the charged 1960 election forward—religious people started to vote in such predictable ways that the mainstream media began to pay them serious attention. In addition, to many thoughtful—and some not so thoughtful—observers, the emergence of the Christian Right in the 1970s and the religious forces behind 9/11 seemed especially conspicuous and alarming. |
| Line 15: |
Line 15: |
| | | | |
| | Some believe that a ‘Charismatic’ Awakening occurred between 1961 and 1982. This “Charismatic” Awakening stemmed from a | | Some believe that a ‘Charismatic’ Awakening occurred between 1961 and 1982. This “Charismatic” Awakening stemmed from a |
| − | Pentecostal movement that placed emphasis on the experience of the Gifts of the Spirit, including speaking in tongues, healing, prophecy and other aspects. It also focused on strengthening spiritual convictions through these gifts and through signs from God and the Holy Spirit. This Protestant movement spread across the “line” to the Roman Catholic faithful at a time when Catholic leaders were opening up the Church to more ecumenical beliefs, to a reduced emphasis on institutional structure, and an increased emphasis on lay spirituality. <ref>Blumhofer and Balmer, 1993</ref> | + | Pentecostal movement that placed emphasis on the experience of the Gifts of the Spirit, including speaking in tongues, healing, prophecy and other aspects. It also focused on strengthening spiritual convictions through these gifts and through signs from God and the Holy Spirit. This Protestant movement spread across the “line” to the Roman Catholic faithful at a time when Catholic leaders were opening up the Church to more ecumenical beliefs, to a reduced emphasis on institutional structure, and an increased emphasis on lay spirituality.<ref>Blumhofer and Balmer, 1993</ref> |
| | ==Comparative data== | | ==Comparative data== |
| | [[File:Belief-god.jpg|thumb|550px|Financial Times (FT)/Harris Poll among adults in 5 countries in 2006]] | | [[File:Belief-god.jpg|thumb|550px|Financial Times (FT)/Harris Poll among adults in 5 countries in 2006]] |
| | | | |
| − | As of 2008, 15% of Americans say they have "no religion"--that is, no church affiliation. Most of them believe in God; 45% "strongly agree" that God exists and another 22% "somewhat agree." 22% of men between ages 18 and 29 report having "no religion." There is a small educational difference, with the college educated slightly more often reporting "no religion."<ref> Christopher McKnight Nichols, "Reconsidering the rise of 'No Religionists' in America," [http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/12/15/who-has-religion/ ''The Immanent Frame'' Dec. 2009]</ref> | + | As of 2008, 15% of Americans say they have "no religion"—that is, no church affiliation. Most of them believe in God; 45% "strongly agree" that God exists and another 22% "somewhat agree." 22% of men between ages 18 and 29 report having "no religion." There is a small educational difference, with the college educated slightly more often reporting "no religion."<ref>Christopher McKnight Nichols, "Reconsidering the rise of 'No Religionists' in America," [http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/12/15/who-has-religion/ ''The Immanent Frame'' Dec. 2009]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==Bibliography== | | ==Bibliography== |
| Line 31: |
Line 31: |
| | * Houck, Davis W., and David E. Dixon, eds. ''Rhetoric, Religion, and the Civil Rights Movement, 1954–1965.'' (Baylor University Press, 2006. xvi, 1002 pp. isbn 978-1-932792-54-6.) | | * Houck, Davis W., and David E. Dixon, eds. ''Rhetoric, Religion, and the Civil Rights Movement, 1954–1965.'' (Baylor University Press, 2006. xvi, 1002 pp. isbn 978-1-932792-54-6.) |
| | * Keller, Rosemary Skinner, Rosemary Radford Ruether, and Marie Cantlon, eds. ''Encyclopedia of Women And Religion in North America'' (3 vol 2006) [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0253346851/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search] | | * Keller, Rosemary Skinner, Rosemary Radford Ruether, and Marie Cantlon, eds. ''Encyclopedia of Women And Religion in North America'' (3 vol 2006) [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0253346851/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search] |
| − | * McClymond, Michael, ed. ''Encyclopedia of Religious Revivals in America.'' (Greenwood, 2007. Vol. 1, A–Z: xxxii, 515 pp. Vol. 2, Primary Documents: xx, 663 pp. isbn 0-313-32828-5/set.) | + | * McClymond, Michael, ed. ''Encyclopedia of Religious Revivals in America.'' (Greenwood, 2007. Vol. 1, A–Z: xxxii, 515 pp. Vol. 2, Primary Documents: xx, 663 pp. isbn 0-313-32828-5/set.) |
| | * McLoughlin, William G. ''Revivals, Awakenings, and Reform: An Essay on Religion and Social Change in America, 1607-1977'' 1978. | | * McLoughlin, William G. ''Revivals, Awakenings, and Reform: An Essay on Religion and Social Change in America, 1607-1977'' 1978. |
| | * Killen, Patricia O’Connell, and Mark Silk, eds. ''Religion and Public Life in the Pacific Northwest: The None Zone'' (Lanham: AltaMira, 2004. 192 pp. isbn 978-0-7591-0625-3.) | | * Killen, Patricia O’Connell, and Mark Silk, eds. ''Religion and Public Life in the Pacific Northwest: The None Zone'' (Lanham: AltaMira, 2004. 192 pp. isbn 978-0-7591-0625-3.) |