Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,629
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + +
Conservapedia talk:Attribution (view source)
Revision as of 18:04, April 24, 2007
, 18:04, April 24, 2007another problem
I am fine with everything EXCEPT the ref to Eminem. I think that inclusion is what is so wildly distorted. the list in the article as is, is fine otherwise. Could be expanded, but that's premature [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:36, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
I am fine with everything EXCEPT the ref to Eminem. I think that inclusion is what is so wildly distorted. the list in the article as is, is fine otherwise. Could be expanded, but that's premature [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:36, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:We have a problem with citing to "anonymous CIA sources"; "anonymous CIA sources" could have their own private political agenda that stands in direct opposition to the peoples democratically elected Executive whom they allegedly serve. And their anonynimty is protected by the [[Intelligence Identities Protection Act]] -- an unusual circumstance for any anonymous source. How do we know that these anonymous sources aren't Valerie Plame, Joseph Wilson, and Philip Agee, serving their own private political agenda in contradiction to a democratically elected Executive? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:04, 24 April 2007 (EDT)