999
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: + +
Conservapedia talk:Attribution (view source)
Revision as of 18:06, April 24, 2007
, 18:06, April 24, 2007→I think if you look at Rob's protection or torture you'll see what he means
:We have a problem with citing to "anonymous CIA sources"; "anonymous CIA sources" could have their own private political agenda that stands in direct opposition to the peoples democratically elected Executive whom they allegedly serve. And their anonymity is protected by the [[Intelligence Identities Protection Act]] -- an unusual circumstance for any anonymous source. How do we know that these anonymous sources aren't Valerie Plame, Joseph Wilson, and Philip Agee, serving their own private political agenda in contradiction to a democratically elected Executive? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:04, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:We have a problem with citing to "anonymous CIA sources"; "anonymous CIA sources" could have their own private political agenda that stands in direct opposition to the peoples democratically elected Executive whom they allegedly serve. And their anonymity is protected by the [[Intelligence Identities Protection Act]] -- an unusual circumstance for any anonymous source. How do we know that these anonymous sources aren't Valerie Plame, Joseph Wilson, and Philip Agee, serving their own private political agenda in contradiction to a democratically elected Executive? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:04, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
::Because we have to have faith in the system ubntil it proves otherwise. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:06, 24 April 2007 (EDT)