Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:     
Would like to start by pointing out one clear error for starters. At the start of the study, the women where between ages of 29-46 [http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/8/814] So, how can one get the avrage age of the womens in the study to be 42 now 14 years later when the yongest women in the study should be atleast 43? [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 14:03, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Would like to start by pointing out one clear error for starters. At the start of the study, the women where between ages of 29-46 [http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/8/814] So, how can one get the avrage age of the womens in the study to be 42 now 14 years later when the yongest women in the study should be atleast 43? [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 14:03, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: By the way, I have a copy of the paper and can email to a few '''open-minded''' readers here who want to analyze its or my claims further.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,482

edits

Navigation menu