Changes

[[File:JanTheRiviter 480x480.jpg|right|225px]]

[[File:JanTheRiviter 480x480.jpg|right|225px]]

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], P.J. Crowley, and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support<ref> http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref> <ref> http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref>. It appears that [[liberal|liberals]] are ignorant in or have difficulty in reading the law. The purpose and goal of this article is not to give a comprehensive history of the bill, but so that everyone, especially liberals, can read and understand the bill and things related to the bill. Presented below are all of the 18 final pages of the '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' (also known as '''Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act''') so that liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. The original version can be read [http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf here] and [http://senatebill1070.com/arizona-senate-bill-1070/full-text-of-arizona-senate-bill-1070/ here], but now, the final, complete version can be read here below '''word for word'''. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, [[racial profiling]]. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref> http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], P.J. Crowley, and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support.<ref>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref><ref>http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref> It appears that [[liberal]]s are ignorant in or have difficulty in reading the law. The purpose and goal of this article is not to give a comprehensive history of the bill, but so that everyone, especially liberals, can read and understand the bill and things related to the bill. Presented below are all of the 18 final pages of the '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' (also known as '''Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act''') so that liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. The original version can be read [http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf here] and [http://senatebill1070.com/arizona-senate-bill-1070/full-text-of-arizona-senate-bill-1070/ here], but now, the final, complete version can be read here below '''word for word'''. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, [[racial profiling]]. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref>http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.

Notes: The CAPITALIZED text is amendments of the original bill. The ''italicized'' text denotes changes made

Notes: The CAPITALIZED text is amendments of the original bill. The ''italicized'' text denotes changes made

On April 23, 2010, Senate Bill 1070 (sponsored by Senator Russell Pearce) was signed into law. SB1070 was enacted as Laws 2010, Chapter 113. House Bill 2162 made additional changes to Laws 2010. Below is an engrossed version of

On April 23, 2010, Senate Bill 1070 (sponsored by Senator Russell Pearce) was signed into law. SB1070 was enacted as Laws 2010, Chapter 113. House Bill 2162 made additional changes to Laws 2010. Below is an engrossed version of

SB1070 with the pertinent changes made by the Conference Engrossed HB2162. <ref> http://www.azleg.gov/alispdfs/council/SB1070-HB2162.PDF. </ref> <ref> http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/SB1070-HB2162New.PDF </ref>

SB1070 with the pertinent changes made by the Conference Engrossed HB2162.<ref>http://www.azleg.gov/alispdfs/council/SB1070-HB2162.PDF.</ref><ref>http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/SB1070-HB2162New.PDF</ref>

==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==

==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==

==== Enactment of the bill ====

==== Enactment of the bill ====

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed SB 1070 into law on April 23, 2010.<ref> http://www.fairus.org/site/DocServer/ariz_SB1070_summary.pdf?docID=4761</ref> It is scheduled to go into effect on July 28, 2010, ninety days after the end of the legislative session.<ref> http://www.azleg.gov/GeneralEffectiveDates.asp </ref>

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed SB 1070 into law on April 23, 2010.<ref>http://www.fairus.org/site/DocServer/ariz_SB1070_summary.pdf?docID=4761</ref> It is scheduled to go into effect on July 28, 2010, ninety days after the end of the legislative session.<ref>http://www.azleg.gov/GeneralEffectiveDates.asp</ref>

==== The purpose of the bill ====

==== The purpose of the bill ====

Now that you liberals in particular hopefully have read the law. Here are all the facts below of what the law says in case you didn't understand what it said. The legislative intent of the bill, set forth in Section 1, states that there is a compelling interest in the cooperative enforcement of federal immigration laws throughout all of Arizona, and declares that the intent

Now that you liberals in particular hopefully have read the law. Here are all the facts below of what the law says in case you didn't understand what it said. The legislative intent of the bill, set forth in Section 1, states that there is a compelling interest in the cooperative enforcement of federal immigration laws throughout all of Arizona, and declares that the intent

of the law is to make attrition through enforcement the public policy of all state and local government agencies in Arizona. The provisions of the law are intended to work together to discourage and deter “the unlawful entry and presence of illegal aliens and economic activity by illegal aliens in the United States.”<ref> Same as reference #6 </ref> The bill requires officials and agencies of the state and political subdivisions to fully comply with and assist in the enforcement of federal immigration laws and gives county attorneys subpoena power in certain investigations of employers.  Establishes crimes involving trespassing by illegal aliens, stopping to hire or soliciting work under specified circumstances, and transporting, harboring or concealing unlawful aliens, and their respective penalties.   

of the law is to make attrition through enforcement the public policy of all state and local government agencies in Arizona. The provisions of the law are intended to work together to discourage and deter “the unlawful entry and presence of illegal aliens and economic activity by illegal aliens in the United States.”<ref>Same as reference #6</ref> The bill requires officials and agencies of the state and political subdivisions to fully comply with and assist in the enforcement of federal immigration laws and gives county attorneys subpoena power in certain investigations of employers.  Establishes crimes involving trespassing by illegal aliens, stopping to hire or soliciting work under specified circumstances, and transporting, harboring or concealing unlawful aliens, and their respective penalties.   

==== Background ====

==== Background ====

   

   

====== Investigations of Employers ======

====== Investigations of Employers ======

 

26. Allows the county attorney, in investigations of employers who are alleged to have knowingly or intentionally hired unauthorized aliens, to take evidence, administer oaths or affirmations, issue subpoenas requiring attendance and testimony of witnesses and cause depositions to be taken.

26. Allows the county attorney, in investigations of employers who are alleged to have knowingly or intentionally hired unauthorized aliens, to take evidence, administer oaths or affirmations, issue subpoenas requiring attendance and testimony of witnesses and cause depositions to be taken.

   

   

37. Makes conforming changes.

37. Makes conforming changes.

   

   

38. Becomes effective on the general effective date.<ref> http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/summary/s.1070pshs.doc.htm </ref>

38. Becomes effective on the general effective date.<ref>http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/summary/s.1070pshs.doc.htm</ref>

== U.S immigration policy vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

== U.S immigration policy vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

A comparison reveals that the Arizona Immigration law is less tough and less stricter than current U.S immigration policy requiring alien documentation. Here some of the points of the U.S immigration policy.  

A comparison reveals that the Arizona Immigration law is less tough and less stricter than current U.S immigration policy requiring alien documentation. Here some of the points of the U.S immigration policy.  

In 2005 as a result of the Muller vs. Mena case, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that under Federal Law, cops can pull you over for no reason and demand to see your immigration papers. However, under Arizona’s new law, they do have to have a reason.<ref> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvmypNc7c74</ref>  

In 2005 as a result of the Muller vs. Mena case, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that under Federal Law, cops can pull you over for no reason and demand to see your immigration papers. However, under Arizona’s new law, they do have to have a reason.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvmypNc7c74</ref>  

If illegal entrants to the U.S spend a total of 1 year’s unlawful time in the U.S or are ordered deported by a federal judge (even after spending less than 1 year in the U.S) and then they leave and return or attempt to return to the United States illegally, they become permanently inadmissible. This so called permanent bar is found at § I.N.A 212(a)(9)(C), 8 U.S.C § 1182(a)(9)(c).<ref> http://books.google.com/books?id=8vNnXnJChsoC&pg=PA54&lpg=PA54&dq=u.s+immigration+laws&source=bll&ots=bEJJd7iHua&sig=BwWU_tuYtZ8BXRu0DaLnMRQZeS4&hl=en&ei=gmYATKzRK8LflgfgjoH8CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=18&ved=0CGwQ6AEwEQ#v=onepage&q=u.s%20immigration%20laws&f=false</ref>

If illegal entrants to the U.S spend a total of 1 year’s unlawful time in the U.S or are ordered deported by a federal judge (even after spending less than 1 year in the U.S) and then they leave and return or attempt to return to the United States illegally, they become permanently inadmissible. This so called permanent bar is found at § I.N.A 212(a)(9)(C), 8 U.S.C § 1182(a)(9)(c).<ref>http://books.google.com/books?id=8vNnXnJChsoC&pg=PA54&lpg=PA54&dq=u.s+immigration+laws&source=bll&ots=bEJJd7iHua&sig=BwWU_tuYtZ8BXRu0DaLnMRQZeS4&hl=en&ei=gmYATKzRK8LflgfgjoH8CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=18&ved=0CGwQ6AEwEQ#v=onepage&q=u.s%20immigration%20laws&f=false</ref>

If an alien fails to update the government with a residential address every three months, regardless of whether the address has changed would render the alien deportable<ref> http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Immigration</ref>.

If an alien fails to update the government with a residential address every three months, regardless of whether the address has changed would render the alien deportable.<ref>http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Immigration</ref>

Aliens failing to keep certain registration on their person is a federal crime and will render them deportable.<ref> See reference #5</ref>

Aliens failing to keep certain registration on their person is a federal crime and will render them deportable.<ref>See reference #5</ref>

==== The Secure Communities Program ====

==== The Secure Communities Program ====

Which means many illegal aliens who are otherwise innocent of a crime might be subject to indefinite detention – a violation of due process.  

Which means many illegal aliens who are otherwise innocent of a crime might be subject to indefinite detention – a violation of due process.  

Finally, and perhaps most ominously, state and local jails are not being given the option to participate in Secure Communities. The Department of Homeland Security considers their involvement mandatory. San Francisco, in fact, recently tried to “opt out” of the program, citing civil rights concerns. But California attorney general Jerry Brown, facing a climate of anti-immigrant sentiment, rebuffed that effort.

Finally, and perhaps most ominously, state and local jails are not being given the option to participate in Secure Communities. The Department of Homeland Security considers their involvement mandatory. San Francisco, in fact, recently tried to “opt out” of the program, citing civil rights concerns. But California attorney general Jerry Brown, facing a climate of anti-immigrant sentiment, rebuffed that effort.

In fact, largely out of public view, the White House has been fast-tracking Secure Communities. The program is currently operational in 169 jurisdictions, in 20 states, including Arizona. That makes the Obama administration’s criticism of Arizona’s new enforcement law seem all the more ironic.<ref> http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0610/If-the-Arizona-immigration-law-is-misguided-so-is-Obama-s-criminal-alien-roundup-program </ref>

In fact, largely out of public view, the White House has been fast-tracking Secure Communities. The program is currently operational in 169 jurisdictions, in 20 states, including Arizona. That makes the Obama administration’s criticism of Arizona’s new enforcement law seem all the more ironic.<ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0610/If-the-Arizona-immigration-law-is-misguided-so-is-Obama-s-criminal-alien-roundup-program</ref>

== Other States' immigration policies vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

== Other States' immigration policies vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

== Mexico's immigration policy vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

== Mexico's immigration policy vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

Now, what about Mexico’s immigration policy? Mexico’s immigration policy is even harsher of which Mexican president and America basher [[Felipe Calderon]] seems to be ignorant of since he has attacked and “lectured” the American people on Arizona’s new law<ref> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQhVfRwEE4</ref>, which begs the question: Has he read the new Arizona immigration law and does he read his own laws, especially the ones that has to do with immigration? Just in case he hasn't, here are some of the points of Mexico’s immigration policy:  

Now, what about Mexico’s immigration policy? Mexico’s immigration policy is even harsher of which Mexican president and America basher [[Felipe Calderon]] seems to be ignorant of since he has attacked and “lectured” the American people on Arizona’s new law,<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQhVfRwEE4</ref> which begs the question: Has he read the new Arizona immigration law and does he read his own laws, especially the ones that has to do with immigration? Just in case he hasn't, here are some of the points of Mexico’s immigration policy:  

The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset "the equilibrium of the national demographics."

The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset "the equilibrium of the national demographics."

Foreigners may be kicked out of the country without due process and the endless bites at the litigation apple that illegal aliens are afforded in our country.  

Foreigners may be kicked out of the country without due process and the endless bites at the litigation apple that illegal aliens are afforded in our country.  

Law enforcement officials at all levels -- by national mandate -- must cooperate to enforce immigration laws, including illegal alien arrests and deportations. The Mexican military is also required to assist in immigration enforcement operations.  

Law enforcement officials at all levels—by national mandate—must cooperate to enforce immigration laws, including illegal alien arrests and deportations. The Mexican military is also required to assist in immigration enforcement operations.  

Native-born Mexicans are empowered to make citizens' arrests of illegal aliens and turn them in to authorities.  

Native-born Mexicans are empowered to make citizens' arrests of illegal aliens and turn them in to authorities.  

-Ready to show your papers? Mexico's National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens' identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest as illegal aliens.  

-Ready to show your papers? Mexico's National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens' identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest as illegal aliens.  

All of these provisions are enshrined in Mexico's Ley General de Población (General Law of the Population) and were spotlighted in a 2006 research paper published by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy. There's been no public clamor for "comprehensive immigration reform" in Mexico, however, because pro-illegal alien speech by outsiders is prohibited<ref> http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1929981</ref> <ref> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/</ref>

All of these provisions are enshrined in Mexico's Ley General de Población (General Law of the Population) and were spotlighted in a 2006 research paper published by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy. There's been no public clamor for "comprehensive immigration reform" in Mexico, however, because pro-illegal alien speech by outsiders is prohibited<ref>http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1929981</ref><ref>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/</ref>

Liberals, how's that for racial profiling?

Liberals, how's that for racial profiling?

#If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?

#If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?

#Did you know that there are other states that have tougher immigration policies than Arizona's new act on illegal immigration? Why do you only criticize Arizona, but not other states for their much harsher immigration policies?

#Did you know that there are other states that have tougher immigration policies than Arizona's new act on illegal immigration? Why do you only criticize Arizona, but not other states for their much harsher immigration policies?

#A member of the Somalian Al Shabaab terrorist group may be trying to get into Texas through Mexico. U.S. Homeland Security has asked law enforcement in Houston to be on the lookout for a suspected member of Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida ally based in Somalia<ref> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37368665 </ref> <ref> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSrvfP_Ua8 </ref>. With this in mind, do you prefer Arizona’s new enforcement law against illegal immigration over terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States? Or do you prefer terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States over Arizona’s enforcement law against illegal immigration? Which of the 2 options would you pick if you had to and why?

#A member of the Somalian Al Shabaab terrorist group may be trying to get into Texas through Mexico. U.S. Homeland Security has asked law enforcement in Houston to be on the lookout for a suspected member of Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida ally based in Somalia.<ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37368665</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSrvfP_Ua8</ref> With this in mind, do you prefer Arizona’s new enforcement law against illegal immigration over terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States? Or do you prefer terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States over Arizona’s enforcement law against illegal immigration? Which of the 2 options would you pick if you had to and why?

#Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?

#Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?

#Liberals, now that you've read everything here, what's your response? Your responses should be made in the form of a youtube video.

#Liberals, now that you've read everything here, what's your response? Your responses should be made in the form of a youtube video.

{{reflist|2}}

{{reflist|2}}

==External Links==

==External links==

* [http://senatebill1070.com/ Complete text of the bill.]

* [http://senatebill1070.com/ Complete text of the bill.]

* [http://www.azleg.gov/ Arizona state legislation.]

* [http://www.azleg.gov/ Arizona state legislation.]

* [http://www.castlibrary.com/audio_books/united-states-supreme-court-arizona-vs-united-states Arizona v. United States Audio Book] Bookmarkable m4b audio book of the arguments to the Supreme Court regarding Arizona v. United States

* [http://www.castlibrary.com/audio_books/united-states-supreme-court-arizona-vs-united-states Arizona v. United States Audio Book] Bookmarkable m4b audio book of the arguments to the Supreme Court regarding Arizona v. United States

[[Category: Law]]

[[Category:Law]]

[[Category: Immigration]]

[[Category:Immigration]]