Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
clean up & uniformity
Line 1: Line 1:  
The '''Banach-Tarski paradox''' is that statement that a sphere can be cut into 5 [[Non-measurable set|non-measurable sets of points]], which can then be reassembled into two spheres of equal volume.  It is called a paradox because it violates our physical intuition that this is impossible; however, it should be noted that the "cuts" necessary are infinitely small and precise, and thus cannot be performed by man.  It is very similar to the [[Vitali set]], which was developed to illustrate possible flaws in using the [[Axiom of Choice]] (an element of [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory) in order to prove mathematical claims.  Since the Vitali set is less easily discussed with a layman, the Banach-Tarski paradox is often used to illustrate the "weirdness" of the Axiom of Choice.  
 
The '''Banach-Tarski paradox''' is that statement that a sphere can be cut into 5 [[Non-measurable set|non-measurable sets of points]], which can then be reassembled into two spheres of equal volume.  It is called a paradox because it violates our physical intuition that this is impossible; however, it should be noted that the "cuts" necessary are infinitely small and precise, and thus cannot be performed by man.  It is very similar to the [[Vitali set]], which was developed to illustrate possible flaws in using the [[Axiom of Choice]] (an element of [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory) in order to prove mathematical claims.  Since the Vitali set is less easily discussed with a layman, the Banach-Tarski paradox is often used to illustrate the "weirdness" of the Axiom of Choice.  
   −
This paradox -- or insight -- bears a striking resemblance to the multiplication of the loaves, which is the only miracle described in all four [[Gospels]].
+
This paradox—or insight—bears a striking resemblance to the multiplication of the loaves, which is the only miracle described in all four [[Gospels]].
    
==The Mathematics Behind It==
 
==The Mathematics Behind It==
Line 96: Line 96:  
Some view the Banach-Tarski paradox as an absurd result, and evidence that the [[Axiom of Choice]] is false.  This is the reaction of many non-mathematicians upon hearing this result.  However, as one grows in mathematical understanding one finds it is impossible to avoid - mathematicians have learned to accept the existence of [[non-measurable set]]s, even though these do not match solid objects in the real world.
 
Some view the Banach-Tarski paradox as an absurd result, and evidence that the [[Axiom of Choice]] is false.  This is the reaction of many non-mathematicians upon hearing this result.  However, as one grows in mathematical understanding one finds it is impossible to avoid - mathematicians have learned to accept the existence of [[non-measurable set]]s, even though these do not match solid objects in the real world.
   −
==External Links==
+
==External links==
 
*[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Banach-TarskiParadox.html Banach-Tarski Paradox] at MathWorld
 
*[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Banach-TarskiParadox.html Banach-Tarski Paradox] at MathWorld
    
[[Category:Set Theory]]
 
[[Category:Set Theory]]
−
[[Category:geometry]]
+
[[Category:Geometry]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183

edits

Navigation menu