Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
why no explicit physical descriptions
Line 19: Line 19:  
I think that this article should start with some basic anatomy and physiology, i.e. the anatomy of the male and female reproductive organs and the production of gametes before we move into talking about coitus. I think that it's the objective description of coitus which presents the most problems but there's not reason why we couldn't just have that as a draft rather than all the anatomy and physiology associated with reproduction.  
 
I think that this article should start with some basic anatomy and physiology, i.e. the anatomy of the male and female reproductive organs and the production of gametes before we move into talking about coitus. I think that it's the objective description of coitus which presents the most problems but there's not reason why we couldn't just have that as a draft rather than all the anatomy and physiology associated with reproduction.  
   −
My other suggestion is that we separate our reproduction articles into achieving a zygote and then pregnancy because otherwise this article is going to be huge!
+
My other suggestion is that we separate our reproduction articles into achieving a zygote and then pregnancy because otherwise this article is going to be huge! (comment left by [[user:Kitsune|Kitsune]] at (14:41, 24 April 2007)
 +
 
 +
:Hey Kitsune, I was carefully trying to avoid explicit mention of genitalia or sexual acts in order to stay on the family friendly side of the line.  By the way, can you sign your comments, either using four tildes like this : <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, or using the button above to the right of the red circle crossed "W". [[User:Human|Human]] 15:46, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
2,014

edits

Navigation menu