Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  05:44, July 13, 2016
clean up & uniformity
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[Causation]] is a basic concept in [[philosophy]] and [[law]], and even [[quantum mechanics]] in [[physics]]. Causation is often confused with [[correlation]]; see an [[correlation is not causation|explanation]].
+
'''Causation''' is a basic concept in [[philosophy]] and [[law]], and even [[quantum mechanics]] in [[physics]]. Causation is often confused with [[correlation]]; see an [[correlation is not causation|explanation]].
    
== Law ==
 
== Law ==
   −
Under the [[common law]] of torts, in order to establish [[causation]], a [[plaintiff]] must prove that an actor's conduct "is a substantial factor in bringing about the harm." 2 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 431(a) at 428 (1965). That standard has two dimensions.  
+
Under the [[common law]] of torts, in order to establish causation, a [[plaintiff]] must prove that an actor's conduct "is a substantial factor in bringing about the harm." 2 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 431(a) at 428 (1965). That standard has two dimensions.  
    
First, the evidence must create an inference that the harm would not have occurred in the absence of the actor's conduct. Id. § 431 cmt. a at 429. That showing is commonly referred to as "but-for causation."
 
First, the evidence must create an inference that the harm would not have occurred in the absence of the actor's conduct. Id. § 431 cmt. a at 429. That showing is commonly referred to as "but-for causation."
Line 10: Line 10:     
Thus, both but-for and proximate cause are required to establish causation.
 
Thus, both but-for and proximate cause are required to establish causation.
−
[[category:philosophy]]
+
[[Category:Philosophy]]
 
[[Category:Legal Terms]]
 
[[Category:Legal Terms]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,494

edits

Navigation menu