Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,859
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: − + − +
Chi Iota Colony of Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity v. City Univ. of N.Y. (view source)
Revision as of 06:02, July 13, 2016
, 06:02, July 13, 2016→top: clean up & uniformity
The Court held that the fraternity had a right to meet and exist, but did not have a right to recognition and funding by the public college. It placed particular significance on how the fraternity reached out to the community to attract members, rather than functioning in a manner completely hidden from public view, as though that effects the strength of a club's associative rights. With this reasoning, the Court overturned the lower court's injunction against the school.
The Court held that the fraternity had a right to meet and exist, but did not have a right to recognition and funding by the public college. It placed particular significance on how the fraternity reached out to the community to attract members, rather than functioning in a manner completely hidden from public view, as though that effects the strength of a club's associative rights. With this reasoning, the Court overturned the lower court's injunction against the school.
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
[[Category:Circuit Cases]]
[[category:Second Circuit]]
[[Category:Second Circuit]]