Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,148
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,623:
Line 1,623: + + + + + +
→re: Bible scientific foreknowledge: new section
::Alright, thank you! That would make sense from what I see, because new members always seem to have it. I was thinking that this system could be used more efficiently, but I haven't tried it, so it's very possible there are factors I'm not aware of. Anyway, I'll see if Ed Poor and I can get anywhere with the "woof-woof" then. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 08:11, 21 June 2016 (EDT)
::Alright, thank you! That would make sense from what I see, because new members always seem to have it. I was thinking that this system could be used more efficiently, but I haven't tried it, so it's very possible there are factors I'm not aware of. Anyway, I'll see if Ed Poor and I can get anywhere with the "woof-woof" then. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 08:11, 21 June 2016 (EDT)
== re: Bible scientific foreknowledge ==
I do believe in the doctrine of biblical inerrancy and I also believe the Bile has many cases of fulfilled prophecy. In addition, I also believe that there are cases of [[Bible scientific foreknowledge]].
At the same time, I do some of the material in the Bible scientific foreknowledge article should not be in there. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:16, 13 July 2016 (EDT)