Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes removed ,  06:37, July 13, 2016
→‎top: clean up & uniformity
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Compatibilism''' is the belief that there is no conflict between the ideas of [[free will]] and [[determinism]].<ref>Compatibilism is the thesis that free will is compatible with determinism. [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy] </ref>   
+
'''Compatibilism''' is the belief that there is no conflict between the ideas of [[free will]] and [[determinism]].<ref>Compatibilism is the thesis that free will is compatible with determinism. [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]</ref>   
−
In other words, it is possible for all our actions to be determined by natural forces, and for us to have a meaningfully free will.  They base this belief on a particular definition of "free will" -- to them, an action is "free" if it is not ''forced'' upon a person by compulsion outside the actor.  When an act is caused solely physical causes but is not ''coerced'', compatibilists conclude that the action was both "free" and "determined."  Compatabilists argue that the issue is one of perception rather than reality.  Christian Compatibilists, for example, say God does indeed know past, present and future, because he knows what path someone will take since it is built into that person's identity.  But to the individual making the choice, it appears as if it is totally free -- therefore, it is.  
+
In other words, it is possible for all our actions to be determined by natural forces, and for us to have a meaningfully free will.  They base this belief on a particular definition of "free will"—to them, an action is "free" if it is not ''forced'' upon a person by compulsion outside the actor.  When an act is caused solely physical causes but is not ''coerced'', compatibilists conclude that the action was both "free" and "determined."  Compatabilists argue that the issue is one of perception rather than reality.  Christian Compatibilists, for example, say God does indeed know past, present and future, because he knows what path someone will take since it is built into that person's identity.  But to the individual making the choice, it appears as if it is totally free—therefore, it is.  
    
[[Incompatibilism|Incompatibilists]], by contrast, define an action as "free" if it is ''independent of prior physical cause'', and conclude that if everything has a physical cause, then nothing is free, and therefore that free will and determinism are incompatible.
 
[[Incompatibilism|Incompatibilists]], by contrast, define an action as "free" if it is ''independent of prior physical cause'', and conclude that if everything has a physical cause, then nothing is free, and therefore that free will and determinism are incompatible.
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183

edits

Navigation menu