Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − + Line 18:
Line 18: − +
clean up & uniformity
|city=Durham, North Carolina
|city=Durham, North Carolina
|sports=baseball, basketball, cross country, fencing, field hockey, football, golf, lacrosse, rowing, soccer, swimming and diving, tennis, track and field, volleyball, wrestling<ref>http://www.goduke.com/</ref>
|sports=baseball, basketball, cross country, fencing, field hockey, football, golf, lacrosse, rowing, soccer, swimming and diving, tennis, track and field, volleyball, wrestling<ref>http://www.goduke.com/</ref>
|degrees=Bachelor's, Master's, Doctoral<ref>{{cite web|work=College Board|format=HTML|language=English|accessdate=May 29, 2010|title=College Search - Duke University - Duke - At a Glance|url=http://collegesearch.collegeboard.com/search/CollegeDetail.jsp?collegeId=535}}</ref>
|degrees=Bachelor's, Master's, Doctoral<ref>{{cite web|work=College Board|language=English|accessdate=May 29, 2010|title=College Search - Duke University - Duke - At a Glance|url=http://collegesearch.collegeboard.com/search/CollegeDetail.jsp?collegeId=535}}</ref>
|colors=blue, white
|colors=blue, white
|mascot=Blue Devils
|mascot=Blue Devils
===2006 Lacrosse case===
===2006 Lacrosse case===
In 2006, three Duke players were falsely accused of raping an [[African-American]] woman. The lead prosecutor, Michael Nifong (who has since been disbarred) insinuated that this could have been a hate crime. Before the media convergence on the trial, problems began appearing within the woman's story, as she began to contradict herself. [[Ann Coulter]] wrote several columns in the players' defense. Soon, the players proved their innocence with a negative DNA test and with electronic evidence that they were elsewhere, but a corrupt judge refused to dismiss the charges. The 2006 season was canceled, and the players lost their reputations. Eventually the charges were dropped.
In 2006, three Duke players were falsely accused of raping an [[African-American]] woman. The lead prosecutor, Michael Nifong (who has since been disbarred) insinuated that this could have been a hate crime. Before the media convergence on the trial, problems began appearing within the woman's story, as she began to contradict herself. [[Ann Coulter]] wrote several columns in the players' defense. Soon, the players proved their innocence with a negative DNA test and with electronic evidence that they were elsewhere, but a corrupt judge refused to dismiss the charges. The 2006 season was canceled, and the players lost their reputations. Eventually the charges were dropped.
:''[[New York Times]]'' sports reporter Joe Drape could have been an early hero for the truth, but when Drape began to divert from the favored storyline of ''Times'' editors, he was replaced by another reporter, Duff Wilson, who hewed more closely to the pro-prosecution slant preferred by the liberal editors at the ''Times'' ...<ref> [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/clay-waters/2007/09/19/new-book-destroys-credibility-nyts-duke-lacrosse-rape-coverage News Busters]</ref>
:''[[New York Times]]'' sports reporter Joe Drape could have been an early hero for the truth, but when Drape began to divert from the favored storyline of ''Times'' editors, he was replaced by another reporter, Duff Wilson, who hewed more closely to the pro-prosecution slant preferred by the liberal editors at the ''Times'' ...<ref>[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/clay-waters/2007/09/19/new-book-destroys-credibility-nyts-duke-lacrosse-rape-coverage News Busters]</ref>
The three defendants reached a settlement with the city of Durham (whose prosecutor and judge tried the case) regarding the complaint of the three being subject to malicious prosecution on May 17, 2014.<ref>[http://www.universityherald.com/articles/9457/20140517/durham-duke-lacrosse-rape-stripper-party-lawsuit.htm "Durham city and former Duke lacrosse players settle false rape case"]. (May 17, 2014). University Herald website.</ref>
The three defendants reached a settlement with the city of Durham (whose prosecutor and judge tried the case) regarding the complaint of the three being subject to malicious prosecution on May 17, 2014.<ref>[http://www.universityherald.com/articles/9457/20140517/durham-duke-lacrosse-rape-stripper-party-lawsuit.htm "Durham city and former Duke lacrosse players settle false rape case"]. (May 17, 2014). University Herald website.</ref>