Changes

'''Einstein's radius''' is the radius of curvature of stationary (or less properly called "static") Einstein's universe model that was proposed by Einstein in 1917 and later given up after consensus of astronomers assumed that the universe is expanding. In 1985 it turned out that expansion is only a relativistic illusion produced by coupling of time with space but [[relativists]] didn't accept that and started to suppress notion of illusion by not allowing publications of papers explaining this illusion

'''Einstein's radius''' is the radius of curvature of stationary (or less properly called "static") Einstein's universe model that was proposed by Einstein in 1917 and later given up after consensus of astronomers assumed that the universe is expanding. In 1985 it turned out that expansion is only a relativistic illusion produced by coupling of time with space but [[relativists]] didn't accept that and started to suppress notion of illusion by not allowing publications of papers explaining this illusion

<ref>

.<ref>

See [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] and also Einstein's paper dropped from the bibloigraphy of Einstein's papers in 1973 ''"Gravitation"'' in which Einstein advocated non symmetric metric tensor of spacetime while the Big Bang [[relativists]] assume symmetric metric in that book.

See [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] and also Einstein's paper dropped from the bibloigraphy of Einstein's papers in 1973 ''"Gravitation"'' in which Einstein advocated non symmetric metric tensor of spacetime while the Big Bang [[relativists]] assume symmetric metric in that book.

</ref>. [[Relativists]] insisted that it is not an illusion but a real expansion. Though no scientific theory of expansion could be constructed as it contradicted the conservation laws (conservation of energy and conservation of momentum separately) so the hypothesis of expansion became a true [[cargo cult science]] as described by [[Richard Feynman]] in his rant against [[relativists]].

</ref> [[Relativists]] insisted that it is not an illusion but a real expansion. Though no scientific theory of expansion could be constructed as it contradicted the conservation laws (conservation of energy and conservation of momentum separately) so the hypothesis of expansion became a true [[cargo cult science]] as described by [[Richard Feynman]] in his rant against [[relativists]].

The illusion of expansion is explained in [[Gravitation demystified]] and so '''Einstein's radius''' would be about 13 billion light years. The number coming from division of speed of light by [[Hubble constant]] that represent the [[intrinsic redshift]] in the universe that is result of Newtonian calculation of [[dynamical friction]] of photons in a stationary [[Einstein's universe]]

The illusion of expansion is explained in [[Gravitation demystified]] and so '''Einstein's radius''' would be about 13 billion light years. The number coming from division of speed of light by [[Hubble constant]] that represent the [[intrinsic redshift]] in the universe that is result of Newtonian calculation of [[dynamical friction]] of photons in a stationary [[Einstein's universe]]

<ref>

.<ref>

See the step-by-step derivation of [[intrinsic redshift]] and [[Hubble constant]] in [[Gravitation demystified]] that an intelligent high school student may follow.

See the step-by-step derivation of [[intrinsic redshift]] and [[Hubble constant]] in [[Gravitation demystified]] that an intelligent high school student may follow.

</ref>.

</ref>

The exact value of '''Einstein's radius''' predicted theoretically as value at which the Einstein's field equation is stable or derived from [[intrinsic redshift]] of photons, is

The exact value of '''Einstein's radius''' predicted theoretically as value at which the Einstein's field equation is stable or derived from [[intrinsic redshift]] of photons, is