Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  13:33, July 13, 2016
Line 12: Line 12:     
== Holding of the Majority, by [[Anthony Kennedy]] ==
 
== Holding of the Majority, by [[Anthony Kennedy]] ==
−
Justice Kennedy held, for a majority of 5 justices<ref>Kennedy, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, J.J., and Roberts, C.J.</ref>, that the Act was constitutional.   
+
Justice Kennedy held, for a majority of 5 justices,<ref>Kennedy, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, J.J., and Roberts, C.J.</ref> that the Act was constitutional.   
    
The majority first disagreed with the lower courts, finding that the Act did not ban any abortion practice other than specifically D&X, since it described the procedure to be banned in detail.  Further, high ''[[mens rea]]'' requirements would prohibit conviction for a doctor accidentally performing D&X, as well, so the Act was not only ''not'' unconstitutionally vague, but went very far to protect against erroneous conviction.  As a result, there would be no undue burden imposed on doctors or women, since other abortion procedures would still be available for use within the period for which an abortion is legal under ''Roe'' and ''Casey'' - that is, pre-viability.  The Court employed the doctrine of [[constitutional avoidance]] to make sure that doctors and legislators would be aware that other abortion procedures, specifically D&E, a popular but more humane variant of D&X, would not be banned.  The majority also agreed with Congress on all of its moral "prongs" - that D&X was inhumane, devalued life, devalued medicine, and should be banned.
 
The majority first disagreed with the lower courts, finding that the Act did not ban any abortion practice other than specifically D&X, since it described the procedure to be banned in detail.  Further, high ''[[mens rea]]'' requirements would prohibit conviction for a doctor accidentally performing D&X, as well, so the Act was not only ''not'' unconstitutionally vague, but went very far to protect against erroneous conviction.  As a result, there would be no undue burden imposed on doctors or women, since other abortion procedures would still be available for use within the period for which an abortion is legal under ''Roe'' and ''Casey'' - that is, pre-viability.  The Court employed the doctrine of [[constitutional avoidance]] to make sure that doctors and legislators would be aware that other abortion procedures, specifically D&E, a popular but more humane variant of D&X, would not be banned.  The majority also agreed with Congress on all of its moral "prongs" - that D&X was inhumane, devalued life, devalued medicine, and should be banned.
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183

edits

Navigation menu