Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
7 bytes removed ,  13:34, July 13, 2016
→‎Date: clean up & uniformity
Line 13: Line 13:     
==Date==
 
==Date==
Luke is generally believed to have been written in the 70's or 80's, but it is also possible it was written in the late 50's or early 60's based upon the abrupt ending in Acts.  The thinking goes why wouldn't Luke have continued the history in Acts if he had written it later?  And why wouldn't he have mentioned the [[martyr|martyrdom]] of [[Paul]]?
+
Luke is generally believed to have been written in the 70's or 80's, but it is also possible it was written in the late 50's or early 60's based upon the abrupt ending in Acts.  The thinking goes why wouldn't Luke have continued the history in Acts if he had written it later?  And why wouldn't he have mentioned the [[martyr]]dom of [[Paul]]?
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu