The most obvious error that CMI has made is the mistake of confusing the phonetic component of the Hanzi for the semantic portion. Furthermore, the analysis was gleaned from the simplified Chinese characters, which are a relatively recent invention, and are different from the classical characters. <ref>http://creation.com/chinese-characters-and-genesis The website itself</ref>
+
The most obvious error that CMI has made is the mistake of confusing the phonetic component of the Hanzi for the semantic portion. Furthermore, the analysis was gleaned from the simplified Chinese characters, which are a relatively recent invention, and are different from the classical characters.<ref>http://creation.com/chinese-characters-and-genesis The website itself</ref>
==Examples==
==Examples==
Line 9:
Line 9:
===船 - "Large Boat"===
===船 - "Large Boat"===
−
This is actually the word for a basic boat, or anything that floats and is controllable, "Chuan" (wade-giles "ch'un") The argument that this is evidence for Genesis is as follows.<ref name ="know"> I am a native speaker of Chinese and Japanese</ref>
+
This is actually the word for a basic boat, or anything that floats and is controllable, "Chuan" (wade-giles "ch'un") The argument that this is evidence for Genesis is as follows.<ref name ="know">I am a native speaker of Chinese and Japanese</ref>