Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
54 bytes removed ,  13:58, July 13, 2016
clean up & uniformity
Line 95: Line 95:     
In an article entitled ''Scholarly opinions on the Jesus Myth'', Christopher Price wrote concerning individuals who insist that Jesus Christ was merely a mythical figure:
 
In an article entitled ''Scholarly opinions on the Jesus Myth'', Christopher Price wrote concerning individuals who insist that Jesus Christ was merely a mythical figure:
−
{{cquote|I have often been asked why more academics do not take the time to respond to the Jesus Myth theory. After looking into this question, I discovered that most historians and New Testament scholars relevant to the topic have concluded that Jesus Mythers are beyond reason and therefore decide that they have better things to do with their time.<ref>[http://www.bede.org.uk/price1.htm ''Scholarly opinions on the Jesus Myth'' by Christopher Price</ref>}}
+
{{cquote|I have often been asked why more academics do not take the time to respond to the Jesus Myth theory. After looking into this question, I discovered that most historians and New Testament scholars relevant to the topic have concluded that Jesus Mythers are beyond reason and therefore decide that they have better things to do with their time.<ref>[http://www.bede.org.uk/price1.htm ''Scholarly opinions on the Jesus Myth'' by Christopher Price]</ref>}}
    
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and historical revisionism#Atheists and the denial that Jesus existed|Atheists and the denial that Jesus existed]].  
 
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and historical revisionism#Atheists and the denial that Jesus existed|Atheists and the denial that Jesus existed]].  
Line 101: Line 101:  
=== Atheists and selective use of academic consensus ===
 
=== Atheists and selective use of academic consensus ===
   −
An irony of atheists asserting that Jesus never existed is that atheists often appeal to the academic consensus when it comes to pseudoscience such [[evolution]]. And [[secular left|secular leftists]] often appeal to the academic consensus when engaging in [[global warming]] alarmism.  
+
An irony of atheists asserting that Jesus never existed is that atheists often appeal to the academic consensus when it comes to pseudoscience such [[evolution]]. And [[secular left]]ists often appeal to the academic consensus when engaging in [[global warming]] alarmism.  
−
See also: [[Atheist hypocrisy]].
+
{{See also|Atheist hypocrisy}}
    
==== John Lennox's discussion with New Atheist Richard Dawkins ====
 
==== John Lennox's discussion with New Atheist Richard Dawkins ====
Line 109: Line 109:     
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
−
<div class="references-small">
+
{{Reflist}}
−
<references/>
  −
</div>
      
[[Category:Jesus]]
 
[[Category:Jesus]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,256

edits

Navigation menu