Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,559
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: − + − +
→top: clean up & uniformity
The Court in Linda R. S. was careful to note that the law enforcement policy there challenged could be adequately tested in the courts by an Equal Protection "defense" to a prosecution charging the father of a legitimate child with nonsupport. ''Id.'' at 619 n. 5. No such alternate remedy exists where the policy under challenge is one of bringing absolutely no prosecutions.
The Court in Linda R. S. was careful to note that the law enforcement policy there challenged could be adequately tested in the courts by an Equal Protection "defense" to a prosecution charging the father of a legitimate child with nonsupport. ''Id.'' at 619 n. 5. No such alternate remedy exists where the policy under challenge is one of bringing absolutely no prosecutions.
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:standing]]
[[Category:Standing]]