Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,371
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − + − + − + − +
Moore v. Gunnison Valley Hosp. (view source)
Revision as of 16:15, July 13, 2016
, 16:15, July 13, 2016→top: clean up & uniformity
The Court observed that "[t]here are no significant procedural safeguards" in [[peer review]] at a hospital. Moreover, there is a lack of "direct oversight by a government agency as well as a right to appeal to that agency." Instead, "there is very minimal and undefined oversight by the state medical board and no explicit right of appeal to that board."
The Court observed that "[t]here are no significant procedural safeguards" in [[peer review]] at a hospital. Moreover, there is a lack of "direct oversight by a government agency as well as a right to appeal to that agency." Instead, "there is very minimal and undefined oversight by the state medical board and no explicit right of appeal to that board."
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
[[Category:Circuit Cases]]
[[category:Tenth Circuit]]
[[Category:Tenth Circuit]]
[[category:Judicial Immunity]]
[[Category:Judicial Immunity]]
[[category:peer review]]
[[Category:Peer review]]