Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 68: Line 68:     
: That's part of the spin, of course.  If they reported that of 42 up front, then many informed readers would immediately react, "that's too young for most women to have developed breast cancer!"  FYI, I found the age 42 in table 1.  Murray, let me know if you need a copy.  Your comments are good and I appreciate what you have to say.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:56, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
: That's part of the spin, of course.  If they reported that of 42 up front, then many informed readers would immediately react, "that's too young for most women to have developed breast cancer!"  FYI, I found the age 42 in table 1.  Murray, let me know if you need a copy.  Your comments are good and I appreciate what you have to say.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:56, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::By the way Andy, thanks for your above comment.  Much more data would probably be required for either of us to change our mind about the issue so that we agreed, but it's nice to discuss it calmly and rationally [[User:Murray|Murray]] 21:19, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== Full study text ==
 
== Full study text ==
953

edits

Navigation menu