| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | The '''Progressive Era''' or '''Progressive Movement''', from the 1890s to the 1920s, was a major era in American history. It is most famous for political reforms, as proposed by Republicans [[Theodore Roosevelt]], [[Charles Evans Hughes]] and [[Herbert Hoover]], and Democrat [[Woodrow Wilson]]. The progressive era emphasized efficiency and an end to political corruption, and appealed to well-educated middle class Americans. | + | The '''Progressive Era''' from the tail-end of the 1890s to the 1920s, was a major era in American history. It is most famous for the beginnings of modern political reforms of the first major era of big government, as proposed by Republicans [[Theodore Roosevelt]], [[Charles Evans Hughes]] and [[Herbert Hoover]], and Democrat [[Woodrow Wilson]]. The progressive era outwardly emphasized efficiency and an end to political corruption as appeals to well-educated middle class Americans, but was only cover for the centralization of power within the halls of government. That centralization led to the birth of the modern [[Administrative State]]. |
| | | | |
| | The progressives strongly supported education, science, and medicine, and saw ignorance as the main problem to overcome. They wanted to purify society, and most supported prohibition and woman suffrage. [[Jane Addams]] was the most prominent leader outside government. | | The progressives strongly supported education, science, and medicine, and saw ignorance as the main problem to overcome. They wanted to purify society, and most supported prohibition and woman suffrage. [[Jane Addams]] was the most prominent leader outside government. |
| | | | |
| − | [[Progressive Ideology]] also influenced American business, with entrepreneurs like [[Henry Ford]], [[Andrew Carnegie]], [[John D. Rockefeller]] and [[J. P. Morgan]], who promoted efficiency. they also gave strong support to philanthropy and to religion, especially worldwide Christian missions. | + | [[Progressive Ideology]] also influenced American business, with entrepreneurs like [[Henry Ford]], [[Andrew Carnegie]], [[John D. Rockefeller]] and [[J. P. Morgan]], who promoted efficiency. They also gave strong support to philanthropy and to religion, generally worldwide Christian missions but with a particular focus on emphasizing the [[Social Gospel]] and left-wing [[Social Justice]] initiatives. |
| | | | |
| | [[Booker T. Washington]] was the leading progressive voice in the African American community. | | [[Booker T. Washington]] was the leading progressive voice in the African American community. |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | In 1912 Roosevelt created a new party, the "Progressive Party" to run for president, but he lost and the party faded away. The 1912 party is only a small part of the entire Progressive movement. | | In 1912 Roosevelt created a new party, the "Progressive Party" to run for president, but he lost and the party faded away. The 1912 party is only a small part of the entire Progressive movement. |
| | | | |
| − | The Progressive Era lasted from the 1890s to the 1930s, and influenced all sectors of American society. From the perspective of conservatives in the 21st century, many aspects of the drive for efficiency and against corruption win wide approval. Liberals are split in their evaluation, with many approving the growth of federal power and others opposed to the middle class moralism of the progressives. | + | The Progressive Era lasted about two decades, from the very end of the 1890s to the 1920s, and influenced all sectors of American society. From the perspective of conservatives in the 21st century, many aspects of the drive for efficiency and against corruption win wide approval. Liberals are split in their evaluation, with many approving the growth of federal power and others opposed to the middle class moralism of the progressives. |
| | | | |
| | ==Reform ideas== | | ==Reform ideas== |
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| | | | |
| | ==Prohibition== | | ==Prohibition== |
| − | Prohibition of the manufacture and sale of alcohol was one of the main Progressive causes at the local, state and national level. It achieved national success with the passage of the 18th Amendment by Congress in late 1917, and the ratification by three-fourths of the states in 1919. It took effect in 1920, and was repealed in 1933. Evangelical church groups, especially methodists and Baptists, were the main activists in favor of prohibition. They were mobilized by the highly effective [[Anti-Saloon League]]. | + | Prohibition of the manufacture and sale of alcohol was one of the main Progressive causes at the local, state and national level. It achieved national success with the passage of the 18th Amendment by Congress in late 1917, and the ratification by three-fourths of the states in 1919. It took effect in 1920, and was repealed in 1933. Evangelical church groups, especially Methodists and Baptists, were the main activists in favor of prohibition. They were mobilized by the highly effective [[Anti-Saloon League]]. |
| | | | |
| | ==Constitutional change== | | ==Constitutional change== |
| | The Progressives tried to permanently fix their reforms into law by constitutional amendments, included [[Prohibition]] with the 18th Amendment and [[women's suffrage]] by the 19th amendment, both in 1920 as well as the federal income tax with the 16th amendment and direct election of senators with the 17th amendment. After Progressivism collapsed, the 18th amendment was repealed (in 1933). | | The Progressives tried to permanently fix their reforms into law by constitutional amendments, included [[Prohibition]] with the 18th Amendment and [[women's suffrage]] by the 19th amendment, both in 1920 as well as the federal income tax with the 16th amendment and direct election of senators with the 17th amendment. After Progressivism collapsed, the 18th amendment was repealed (in 1933). |
| | + | |
| | ==Economic conditions== | | ==Economic conditions== |
| | The Progressive Era was one of general prosperity after the [[Panic of 1893]]—a severe depression—ended in 1897. The [[Panic of 1907]] was short and mostly affected financiers. However, Campbell (2005) stresses the weak points of the economy in 1907-1914, linking them to public demands for more Progressive interventions. The Panic of 1907 was followed by a small decline in real wages and increased unemployment, with both trends continuing until World War I. Campbell emphasizes the resulting stress on public finance and the impact on the Wilson administration's policies. The weakened economy and persistent federal deficits led to changes in fiscal policy, including the imposition of federal income taxes on businesses and individuals and the creation of the Federal Reserve System. Government agencies were also transformed in an effort to improve administrative efficiency. | | The Progressive Era was one of general prosperity after the [[Panic of 1893]]—a severe depression—ended in 1897. The [[Panic of 1907]] was short and mostly affected financiers. However, Campbell (2005) stresses the weak points of the economy in 1907-1914, linking them to public demands for more Progressive interventions. The Panic of 1907 was followed by a small decline in real wages and increased unemployment, with both trends continuing until World War I. Campbell emphasizes the resulting stress on public finance and the impact on the Wilson administration's policies. The weakened economy and persistent federal deficits led to changes in fiscal policy, including the imposition of federal income taxes on businesses and individuals and the creation of the Federal Reserve System. Government agencies were also transformed in an effort to improve administrative efficiency. |
| | | | |
| | ==Progressive Politics== | | ==Progressive Politics== |
| − | Almost all major politicians declared their adherence to some progressive measures. In politics the most prominent national figures were Republicans [[Theodore Roosevelt]] and [[Robert LaFollette]] and Democrats [[William Jennings Bryan]] and [[Woodrow Wilson]]. On the far left, the [[IWW]] ("Wobblies") opposed Progressivism because they wanted to destroy capitalism and progressivism wanted to strengthen it. The main labor unions, led by [[Samuel Gompers]] of the [[AFL]], were active supporters of the progressive Movement, as were most businessmen. | + | Almost all major politicians declared their adherence to some progressive measures. In politics the most prominent national figures were Republicans [[Theodore Roosevelt]] and [[Robert LaFollette]] and Democrats [[William Jennings Bryan]] and [[Woodrow Wilson]]. On the [[far left]], the [[IWW]] ("Wobblies") opposed Progressivism because they wanted to destroy capitalism and progressivism wanted to strengthen it. The main labor unions, led by [[Samuel Gompers]] of the [[AFL]], were active supporters of the progressive Movement, as were most businessmen. |
| | + | |
| | + | As a general rule, socialists in America met with very little success during this era if not no success at all. Administrative agencies and expertise, driven by progressive politicians, won out compared with domestic battles of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie. For example, Upton Sinclair wrote his book "''[[The Jungle]]''" hoping to create an uprising but was left dumbfounded when the only thing that resulted from his effort was a much-hailed progressive agency. Additionally, socialists did not successfully nationalize any industry into the hands of government while much of government oversight was increased according to progressive doctrine. |
| | | | |
| | ===Muckraking=== | | ===Muckraking=== |
| | [[Muckraker]]s were journalists who exposed waste, corruption and scandal in the highly influential new medium of national magazines, such as [[McClure's]]. Progressives shared a common belief in the ability of science, technology and disinterested expertise to identify all problems and come up with the one best solution. | | [[Muckraker]]s were journalists who exposed waste, corruption and scandal in the highly influential new medium of national magazines, such as [[McClure's]]. Progressives shared a common belief in the ability of science, technology and disinterested expertise to identify all problems and come up with the one best solution. |
| | + | |
| | ===Purifying democracy=== | | ===Purifying democracy=== |
| | {{main|Initiatives and referendums in the United States}} | | {{main|Initiatives and referendums in the United States}} |
| | | | |
| | Progressives moved to enable the citizenry to rule more directly and circumvent political bosses; California, Wisconsin and Oregon took the lead. California and Oregon established the [[Initiative]], [[Referendum]], and [[Recall]]. About 16 states began using [[Primary election]]s. Many cities set up municipal reference bureaus to study the budgets and administrative structures of local governments. In Illinois, governor [[Frank Lowden]] undertook a major reorganization of state government. In Wisconsin, the stronghold of [[Robert LaFollette]], the [[Wisconsin Idea]], inspired by Charles McCarthy, used the state university as the source of ideas and expertise. | | Progressives moved to enable the citizenry to rule more directly and circumvent political bosses; California, Wisconsin and Oregon took the lead. California and Oregon established the [[Initiative]], [[Referendum]], and [[Recall]]. About 16 states began using [[Primary election]]s. Many cities set up municipal reference bureaus to study the budgets and administrative structures of local governments. In Illinois, governor [[Frank Lowden]] undertook a major reorganization of state government. In Wisconsin, the stronghold of [[Robert LaFollette]], the [[Wisconsin Idea]], inspired by Charles McCarthy, used the state university as the source of ideas and expertise. |
| | + | |
| | ===Antitrust=== | | ===Antitrust=== |
| | [[Trusts]] were a major issue, with public opinion fearing that large corporations could impose monopolistic prices to cheat the consumer and squash small independent companies. By 1904, 318 trusts controlled about two-fifths of the nation's manufacturing output, not to mention powerful trusts in non-manufacturing sectors such as railroads, local transit, and banking. Roosevelt's Justice Department launched 44 antitrust suits. | | [[Trusts]] were a major issue, with public opinion fearing that large corporations could impose monopolistic prices to cheat the consumer and squash small independent companies. By 1904, 318 trusts controlled about two-fifths of the nation's manufacturing output, not to mention powerful trusts in non-manufacturing sectors such as railroads, local transit, and banking. Roosevelt's Justice Department launched 44 antitrust suits. |
| | + | |
| | ===TR moves left 1907-1912=== | | ===TR moves left 1907-1912=== |
| − | By 1907-08, his last two years in office, Roosevelt was increasingly distrustful of big business, despite its close ties to the Republican party in every large state. Roosevelt, freely lambasting his critics and conservative judges, called on Congress to enact a series of radical new laws that would regulate the economy. He wanted a national incorporation law (all corporations had state charters, which varied greatly state by state), a federal income tax and inheritance tax (both targeted on the rich), limits on the use of court injunctions against labor unions during strikes (injunctions were a powerful weapon that mostly helped business), an employee liability law for industrial injuries (pre-empting state laws), an eight-hour law for federal employees, a postal savings system (to provide competition for local banks), and, finally, campaign reform laws. None of his agenda was enacted, and Roosevelt carried over the ideas into the 1912 campaign. Roosevelt's increasingly radical stance proved popular in the Midwest and Pacific Coast, and among farmers, teachers, clergymen, clerical workers and some proprietors, but was appeared as divisive and unnecessary to eastern Republicans, corporate executives, lawyers, party workers, and Congressmen. | + | By 1907-08, his last two years in office, Roosevelt was increasingly distrustful of big business, despite its close ties to the Republican party in every large state. Roosevelt, freely lambasting his critics and conservative judges, called on Congress to enact a series of radical new laws that would regulate the economy. He wanted a national incorporation law (all corporations had state charters, which varied greatly state by state), a federal income tax and inheritance tax (both targeted on the rich), limits on the use of court injunctions against labor unions during strikes (injunctions were a powerful weapon that mostly helped business), an employee liability law for industrial injuries (pre-empting state laws), an eight-hour law for federal employees, a postal savings system (to provide competition for local banks), and, finally, campaign reform laws. None of his agenda was enacted, and Roosevelt carried over the ideas into the 1912 campaign. Roosevelt's increasingly radical stance proved popular in the Midwest and Pacific Coast, and among farmers, teachers, clergymen, clerical workers and some proprietors, but was appeared as divisive and unnecessary to eastern Republicans, corporate executives, lawyers, party workers, and Congressmen. |
| | + | |
| | ===Taft elected=== | | ===Taft elected=== |
| | Roosevelt certified Taft a genuine "progressive" in 1908 when he pushed through the nomination of his uncharismatic Secretary of War. With most northern states safely Republican, Taft easily won. He defeated [[William Jennings Bryan]], who was running his third race, this time claiming that he not Taft was the true progressive. Taft sincerely considered himself a "progressive" because in his deep belief in "The Law" as the scientific device that should be used by judges to solve society's problems. | | Roosevelt certified Taft a genuine "progressive" in 1908 when he pushed through the nomination of his uncharismatic Secretary of War. With most northern states safely Republican, Taft easily won. He defeated [[William Jennings Bryan]], who was running his third race, this time claiming that he not Taft was the true progressive. Taft sincerely considered himself a "progressive" because in his deep belief in "The Law" as the scientific device that should be used by judges to solve society's problems. |
| Line 50: |
Line 57: |
| | | | |
| | Under the leadership of Senators [[Robert LaFollette]] of Wisconsin and [[Albert Beveridge]] of Indiana, Midwestern GOP progressives increasingly became party insurgents, battling both Taft and the conservative wing of the Republican party. The tariff issue initially brought the insurgents together, but they broadened their attack to cover a wide range of issues. In 1910 they cooperated with Democrats to reduce the power of Speaker [[Joe Cannon]], a key conservative. In 1911 LaFollette created the National Progressive Republican League to defeat the power of political bossism at the state level, and to replace Taft at the national level. More trouble came when Taft fired [[Gifford Pinchot]], a leading conservationist and close ally of Roosevelt, who had alleged that Taft's Secretary of Interior was in league with big timber interests. Conservationists sided with Pinchot, as Taft alienated yet another vocal constituency. Roosevelt, back from Europe, launched an attack on the federal courts, which deeply upset Taft. In the 1910 Congressional elections, Democrats swept to power and Taft's reelection in 1912 was increasingly in doubt. | | Under the leadership of Senators [[Robert LaFollette]] of Wisconsin and [[Albert Beveridge]] of Indiana, Midwestern GOP progressives increasingly became party insurgents, battling both Taft and the conservative wing of the Republican party. The tariff issue initially brought the insurgents together, but they broadened their attack to cover a wide range of issues. In 1910 they cooperated with Democrats to reduce the power of Speaker [[Joe Cannon]], a key conservative. In 1911 LaFollette created the National Progressive Republican League to defeat the power of political bossism at the state level, and to replace Taft at the national level. More trouble came when Taft fired [[Gifford Pinchot]], a leading conservationist and close ally of Roosevelt, who had alleged that Taft's Secretary of Interior was in league with big timber interests. Conservationists sided with Pinchot, as Taft alienated yet another vocal constituency. Roosevelt, back from Europe, launched an attack on the federal courts, which deeply upset Taft. In the 1910 Congressional elections, Democrats swept to power and Taft's reelection in 1912 was increasingly in doubt. |
| | + | |
| | ===TR breaks with Taft, 1911=== | | ===TR breaks with Taft, 1911=== |
| | Late in 1911 Roosevelt finally broke with Taft and announced as a candidate for the Republican nomination. Most of LaFollette's supporters went over to Roosevelt, leaving the Wisconsin Senator embittered. Roosevelt, stepping up his attack on judges, carried 9 of the states with preferential primaries, LaFollette took two, and Taft only one. Most professional Republican politicians were supporting Taft, and they proved difficult to upset in non-primary states. In a decisive move, Taft's people purchased support of corrupt politicians who represented the shadow Republican party in southern states that were overwhelmingly Democratic. Taft delegates beat back challenges to their southern delegations, proving that Taft had a slim majority at the Republican national convention. Roosevelt's people had made similar purchases in the South 1904, but this time the Rough Rider called foul. Not since 1872 had there been a major schism in the Republican party; with the Democrats holding about 45% of the national vote, any schism would be fatal. Unable to tolerate the personal humiliation he suffered at the hands of Taft and the Old Guard, and refusing to entertain the possibility of a compromise candidate, Roosevelt struck back hard. Outvoted, Roosevelt pulled his delegates off the convention floor and decided to form a third party. | | Late in 1911 Roosevelt finally broke with Taft and announced as a candidate for the Republican nomination. Most of LaFollette's supporters went over to Roosevelt, leaving the Wisconsin Senator embittered. Roosevelt, stepping up his attack on judges, carried 9 of the states with preferential primaries, LaFollette took two, and Taft only one. Most professional Republican politicians were supporting Taft, and they proved difficult to upset in non-primary states. In a decisive move, Taft's people purchased support of corrupt politicians who represented the shadow Republican party in southern states that were overwhelmingly Democratic. Taft delegates beat back challenges to their southern delegations, proving that Taft had a slim majority at the Republican national convention. Roosevelt's people had made similar purchases in the South 1904, but this time the Rough Rider called foul. Not since 1872 had there been a major schism in the Republican party; with the Democrats holding about 45% of the national vote, any schism would be fatal. Unable to tolerate the personal humiliation he suffered at the hands of Taft and the Old Guard, and refusing to entertain the possibility of a compromise candidate, Roosevelt struck back hard. Outvoted, Roosevelt pulled his delegates off the convention floor and decided to form a third party. |
| | + | |
| | ==Progressive party of 1912== | | ==Progressive party of 1912== |
| | The "[[Progressive Party]] nicknamed the "Bull Moose Party" was the third party created by [[Theodore Roosevelt]] in 1912 in his effort to punish President [[William Howard Taft]] for "stealing" the Republican nomination. Political progressivism was a powerful force at the national level, and in the first dozen years of the century Roosevelt was its most articulate spokesman. Roosevelt, trained as a biologist and naturalist, identified himself and his programs with the mystique of science. The other side of [[Progressivism]] was a burning hatred of [[corruption]] and a fear of powerful and dangerous forces, such as political machines, labor unions and "trusts" (large corporations.) Roosevelt, the former deputy sheriff on the Dakota frontier, and police commissioner of New York City, knew evil when he saw it and was dedicated to destroying it. Roosevelt's moralistic determination set the tone of national politics. | | The "[[Progressive Party]] nicknamed the "Bull Moose Party" was the third party created by [[Theodore Roosevelt]] in 1912 in his effort to punish President [[William Howard Taft]] for "stealing" the Republican nomination. Political progressivism was a powerful force at the national level, and in the first dozen years of the century Roosevelt was its most articulate spokesman. Roosevelt, trained as a biologist and naturalist, identified himself and his programs with the mystique of science. The other side of [[Progressivism]] was a burning hatred of [[corruption]] and a fear of powerful and dangerous forces, such as political machines, labor unions and "trusts" (large corporations.) Roosevelt, the former deputy sheriff on the Dakota frontier, and police commissioner of New York City, knew evil when he saw it and was dedicated to destroying it. Roosevelt's moralistic determination set the tone of national politics. |
| Line 57: |
Line 66: |
| | Roosevelt, Pinchot, Beveridge and their allies created the Progressive Party in 1912, structuring it as a permanent organization that would field complete tickets at the presidential and state level. At his Chicago convention Roosevelt cried out, "We stand at Armageddon and we battle for the Lord." The crusading rhetoric resonated well with the delegates, many of them long-time reformers, crusaders, activists and opponents of politics as usual. Included in the ranks were Jane Addams and other feminists and peace activists. The platform echoed Roosevelt's 1907-8 proposals, calling for vigorous government intervention to protect the people from the selfish interests. | | Roosevelt, Pinchot, Beveridge and their allies created the Progressive Party in 1912, structuring it as a permanent organization that would field complete tickets at the presidential and state level. At his Chicago convention Roosevelt cried out, "We stand at Armageddon and we battle for the Lord." The crusading rhetoric resonated well with the delegates, many of them long-time reformers, crusaders, activists and opponents of politics as usual. Included in the ranks were Jane Addams and other feminists and peace activists. The platform echoed Roosevelt's 1907-8 proposals, calling for vigorous government intervention to protect the people from the selfish interests. |
| | | | |
| − | Many Progressives such as LaFolletee strongly opposed the new party. The great majority of Republican governors, congressmen, editors and local leaders refused to join the new party, even if they had supported Roosevelt before. Only five of the 15 most prominent progressive Republicans in the Senate endorsed the new party; three came out for Wilson. For men expecting a future in politics, bolting the party ticket was simply too radical a step; for others it was safer to go with Wilson, and quite a few supporters of progressivism had doubts about the reliability of Roosevelt's beliefs. If The Bull Moose had only run a presidential ticket, it might have attracted many more Republicans willing to split their ballot. But the progressive movement was strongest at the state level, and therefore the new party had to field candidates for governor and state legislature. In Pittsburgh, the local Republican boss, at odds with state party leaders, joined Roosevelt's cause. In California, Governor [[Hiram Johnson]] and the Bull Moosers took control of the regular Republicans party; Taft was not even listed on the California ballot. Johnson became Roosevelt's running-mate. In most states there were full Republican and Progressive tickets in the field, thus splitting the Republican vote. The [[Socialist party]], also troubled by deep internal divisions, again nominated [[Eugene Debs]], their best stump speaker. The central problem faced by the Bull Moosers was that the Democrats were more united and optimistic than they had been in years | + | Many Progressives such as LaFollette strongly opposed the new party. The great majority of Republican governors, congressmen, editors and local leaders refused to join the new party, even if they had supported Roosevelt before. Only five of the 15 most prominent progressive Republicans in the Senate endorsed the new party; three came out for Wilson. For men expecting a future in politics, bolting the party ticket was simply too radical a step; for others it was safer to go with Wilson, and quite a few supporters of progressivism had doubts about the reliability of Roosevelt's beliefs. If The Bull Moose had only run a presidential ticket, it might have attracted many more Republicans willing to split their ballot. But the progressive movement was strongest at the state level, and therefore the new party had to field candidates for governor and state legislature. In Pittsburgh, the local Republican boss, at odds with state party leaders, joined Roosevelt's cause. In California, Governor [[Hiram Johnson]] and the Bull Moosers took control of the regular Republicans party; Taft was not even listed on the California ballot. Johnson became Roosevelt's running-mate. In most states there were full Republican and Progressive tickets in the field, thus splitting the Republican vote. The [[Socialist party]], also troubled by deep internal divisions, again nominated [[Eugene Debs]], their best stump speaker. The central problem faced by the Bull Moosers was that the Democrats were more united and optimistic than they had been in years. |
| | + | |
| | ===Wilson the Democrat=== | | ===Wilson the Democrat=== |
| | The Bull Moosers fancied they had a chance to win by drawing out progressive elements from both the Republican and Democratic parties, That dream evaporated in July, when after 46 roll calls the Democrats unexpectedly rejected party hacks such as [[Champ Clark]] and instead nominated their most articulate and prominent progressive, [[Woodrow Wilson]]. As the crusading governor of New Jersey, Wilson had attracted national attention. As a leading educator and political scientist, he qualified as the ideal "expert" to handle affairs of state. Wilson appealed to regular Democrats, to progressive Democrats, and to independent progressives of the sort Roosevelt was targeting. Half or more of the independent progressives flocked to Wilson's camp, both because of Wilson's policies and in the expectation of victory, leaving the Bull Moose party high and dry. Roosevelt haters, such as LaFollette, also voted for Wilson instead of wasting their vote on Taft who could never win. Roosevelt nonetheless conducted a vigorous national campaign, denouncing the way the Republican nomination had been "stolen." He bundled together his reforms under the rubric of "The New Nationalism" and stumped the country for a strong federal role in regulating the economy, and, especially, watching and chastising bad corporations and overruling federal and state judges who made unprogressive decisions. Wilson called for a "New Freedom," which emphasized individualism rather than the collectivism that Roosevelt was promoting. Once he was in office, however, Wilson in practice supported reforms that resembled Roosevelt's collectivism more than his own individualism. Taft, knowing he had no chance to win, campaigned quietly, emphasizing the superior role of judges over the demagogy of elected officials. The departure of the more extreme progressives left the conservatives even more firmly in control of the GOP, and many of the Old Guard leaders distrusted Taft as a bit too progressive for their taste, especially on matters of antitrust and tariffs. Much of the Republican effort was designed to discredit Roosevelt as a dangerous radical, but the people knew the Rough Rider too well to buy that argument. The result was the weakest Republican effort in history. All three national campaigns were suspended for a while in October, as Roosevelt recuperated from an assassination attempt. (The bullet was partly absorbed by the text of a long speech in Roosevelt's pocket; bleeding and slightly dazed, he insisted on finishing the speech before being rushed off to the hospital.) | | The Bull Moosers fancied they had a chance to win by drawing out progressive elements from both the Republican and Democratic parties, That dream evaporated in July, when after 46 roll calls the Democrats unexpectedly rejected party hacks such as [[Champ Clark]] and instead nominated their most articulate and prominent progressive, [[Woodrow Wilson]]. As the crusading governor of New Jersey, Wilson had attracted national attention. As a leading educator and political scientist, he qualified as the ideal "expert" to handle affairs of state. Wilson appealed to regular Democrats, to progressive Democrats, and to independent progressives of the sort Roosevelt was targeting. Half or more of the independent progressives flocked to Wilson's camp, both because of Wilson's policies and in the expectation of victory, leaving the Bull Moose party high and dry. Roosevelt haters, such as LaFollette, also voted for Wilson instead of wasting their vote on Taft who could never win. Roosevelt nonetheless conducted a vigorous national campaign, denouncing the way the Republican nomination had been "stolen." He bundled together his reforms under the rubric of "The New Nationalism" and stumped the country for a strong federal role in regulating the economy, and, especially, watching and chastising bad corporations and overruling federal and state judges who made unprogressive decisions. Wilson called for a "New Freedom," which emphasized individualism rather than the collectivism that Roosevelt was promoting. Once he was in office, however, Wilson in practice supported reforms that resembled Roosevelt's collectivism more than his own individualism. Taft, knowing he had no chance to win, campaigned quietly, emphasizing the superior role of judges over the demagogy of elected officials. The departure of the more extreme progressives left the conservatives even more firmly in control of the GOP, and many of the Old Guard leaders distrusted Taft as a bit too progressive for their taste, especially on matters of antitrust and tariffs. Much of the Republican effort was designed to discredit Roosevelt as a dangerous radical, but the people knew the Rough Rider too well to buy that argument. The result was the weakest Republican effort in history. All three national campaigns were suspended for a while in October, as Roosevelt recuperated from an assassination attempt. (The bullet was partly absorbed by the text of a long speech in Roosevelt's pocket; bleeding and slightly dazed, he insisted on finishing the speech before being rushed off to the hospital.) |
| | + | |
| | ===Election results 1912=== | | ===Election results 1912=== |
| | Roosevelt succeeded in his main goal of punishing Taft; with 4.1 million votes (27%) he ran well ahead of Taft's 3.5 million (23%). However, Wilson's 6.3 million votes (42%) was enough to garner 435 electoral votes. Taft, with two small states, Vermont and Utah, had 8 electoral votes. Roosevelt had 88: Pennsylvania was his only Eastern state; in the Midwest he carried Michigan, Minnesota and South Dakota; in the West, California and Washington; in the South, nothing. The Democrats gained ten seats in the Senate, just enough to form a majority, and 63 new House seats to solidify their control there. Progressive statewide candidates trailed about 20 percent behind Roosevelt's vote. Almost all, including Beveridge of Indiana, went down to defeat; the only governor elected was Johnson of California. Seventeen Bull Moosers were elected to Congress, and perhaps 250 to local office. Outside California there obviously was no real base to the party beyond the personality of himself. | | Roosevelt succeeded in his main goal of punishing Taft; with 4.1 million votes (27%) he ran well ahead of Taft's 3.5 million (23%). However, Wilson's 6.3 million votes (42%) was enough to garner 435 electoral votes. Taft, with two small states, Vermont and Utah, had 8 electoral votes. Roosevelt had 88: Pennsylvania was his only Eastern state; in the Midwest he carried Michigan, Minnesota and South Dakota; in the West, California and Washington; in the South, nothing. The Democrats gained ten seats in the Senate, just enough to form a majority, and 63 new House seats to solidify their control there. Progressive statewide candidates trailed about 20 percent behind Roosevelt's vote. Almost all, including Beveridge of Indiana, went down to defeat; the only governor elected was Johnson of California. Seventeen Bull Moosers were elected to Congress, and perhaps 250 to local office. Outside California there obviously was no real base to the party beyond the personality of himself. |
| | + | |
| | ===Bull Moose party disintegrates=== | | ===Bull Moose party disintegrates=== |
| | Roosevelt had scored a second-place finish, but he trailed so far behind Wilson that everyone realized his party would never win the White House. With the poor performance at state and local levels in 1912, the steady defection of top supporters, the failure to attract any new support, and a pathetic showing in 1914, the Bull Moose party disintegrated. Some leaders, such as [[Harold L. Ickes|Harold Ickes]] of Chicago, supported Wilson in 1916. Most followed Roosevelt back into the GOP, which nominated [[Charles Evans Hughes]]. Hughes had a progressive record in New York, and sat out the divisive years of 1910-1916 on the Supreme Court, so he was acceptable to all factions. The ironies were many: Taft had been Roosevelt's hand-picked successor in 1908 and the split between the two men was personal and bitter; if Roosevelt had just waited he probably would have been nominated and elected in 1916; his schism allowed the conservatives to gain control of the Republican party and left Roosevelt and his followers drifting in the wilderness. Out in California, Johnson snubbed Hughes in 1916 and threw the election to Wilson. During the Great War, Roosevelt himself moved to the right, stressing Americanism and denouncing Wilson's weak military policies. He probably would have been the 1920 GOP nominee, but he had aged rapidly and died early in 1919, aged 60, from the effects of a tropical disease. Taft went on to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the position he wanted far more than President. Although Franklin Roosevelt attracted Ickes and a few other prominent Bull Moosers to his cause in the 1930s, two-thirds of those still politically active rejected the New Deal. | | Roosevelt had scored a second-place finish, but he trailed so far behind Wilson that everyone realized his party would never win the White House. With the poor performance at state and local levels in 1912, the steady defection of top supporters, the failure to attract any new support, and a pathetic showing in 1914, the Bull Moose party disintegrated. Some leaders, such as [[Harold L. Ickes|Harold Ickes]] of Chicago, supported Wilson in 1916. Most followed Roosevelt back into the GOP, which nominated [[Charles Evans Hughes]]. Hughes had a progressive record in New York, and sat out the divisive years of 1910-1916 on the Supreme Court, so he was acceptable to all factions. The ironies were many: Taft had been Roosevelt's hand-picked successor in 1908 and the split between the two men was personal and bitter; if Roosevelt had just waited he probably would have been nominated and elected in 1916; his schism allowed the conservatives to gain control of the Republican party and left Roosevelt and his followers drifting in the wilderness. Out in California, Johnson snubbed Hughes in 1916 and threw the election to Wilson. During the Great War, Roosevelt himself moved to the right, stressing Americanism and denouncing Wilson's weak military policies. He probably would have been the 1920 GOP nominee, but he had aged rapidly and died early in 1919, aged 60, from the effects of a tropical disease. Taft went on to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the position he wanted far more than President. Although Franklin Roosevelt attracted Ickes and a few other prominent Bull Moosers to his cause in the 1930s, two-thirds of those still politically active rejected the New Deal. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==End of the Era== |
| | + | While there is not full agreement as to when the Progressive Era began, the end of the Progressive Era is always noted in the same year: 1920. As progressive author and founder of [[The New Republic]] [[Herbert Croly]] noted at the time, the "eclipse" of "progressivism as an effective force in American politics" was the "chief distinguishing aspect" of the 1920 election.<ref>[https://newrepublic.com/article/78969/the-eclipse-progressivism The Eclipse of Progressivism]</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | But while the era ended with the election in 1920, progressivism would make a roaring comeback in the 1930s under the name of "liberalism", having had its [[Progressivism#Name_Change|label changed]] by [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]]. |
| | | | |
| | ==Notable Progressive political leaders== | | ==Notable Progressive political leaders== |
| Line 99: |
Line 116: |
| | *[[Louis Brandeis|Louis D. Brandeis]], lawyer, Supreme Court justice | | *[[Louis Brandeis|Louis D. Brandeis]], lawyer, Supreme Court justice |
| | *[[Nicholas Murray Butler]], educator | | *[[Nicholas Murray Butler]], educator |
| − | * [[Herbert Croly]], magazine editor of ''[[New Republic]]''; political commentator | + | *[[Herbert Croly]], magazine editor of ''[[New Republic]]''; political commentator |
| | *[[John R. Commons]], economist | | *[[John R. Commons]], economist |
| | *[[Andrew Carnegie]], philanthropist | | *[[Andrew Carnegie]], philanthropist |
| Line 144: |
Line 161: |
| | * [[Social Gospel]] | | * [[Social Gospel]] |
| | * [[Progressive Party]], 1912 | | * [[Progressive Party]], 1912 |
| | + | * [[Roaring Twenties]] |
| | + | * [[Birth control and racism]] |
| | + | *[[Secular Europe and eugenics]] |
| | | | |
| | ==Bibliography== | | ==Bibliography== |
| Line 150: |
Line 170: |
| | * Buenker, John D. and Joseph Buenker, Eds. ''Encyclopedia of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era.'' (2005) 1290 pp. in three volumes. . 900 articles by 200 scholars | | * Buenker, John D. and Joseph Buenker, Eds. ''Encyclopedia of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era.'' (2005) 1290 pp. in three volumes. . 900 articles by 200 scholars |
| | * Buenker, John D. ed. ''Dictionary of the Progressive Era'' (1980), short articles by scholars | | * Buenker, John D. ed. ''Dictionary of the Progressive Era'' (1980), short articles by scholars |
| − | * Chambers, John Whiteclay, II. ''The Tyranny of Change: America in the Progressive Era, 1890-1920'' (2000), textbook [http://www.amazon.com/Tyranny-Change-America-Progressive-1890-1920/dp/0813527996/ref=sr_1_26?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878274&sr=8-26 excerpt and text search] | + | * Chambers, John Whiteclay, II. ''The Tyranny of Change: America in the Progressive Era, 1890-1920'' (2000), textbook [https://www.amazon.com/Tyranny-Change-America-Progressive-1890-1920/dp/0813527996/ref=sr_1_26?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878274&sr=8-26 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Crunden, Robert M. ''Ministers of Reform: The Progressives' Achievement in American Civilization, 1889-1920'' (1982) [http://www.amazon.com/Ministers-Reform-Progressives-Achievement-Civilization/dp/0252011678/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634251&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Crunden, Robert M. ''Ministers of Reform: The Progressives' Achievement in American Civilization, 1889-1920'' (1982) [https://www.amazon.com/Ministers-Reform-Progressives-Achievement-Civilization/dp/0252011678/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634251&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Diner, Steven J. ''A Very Different Age: Americans of the Progressive Era'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/Very-Different-Age-Americans-Progressive/dp/0809025531/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634565&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Diner, Steven J. ''A Very Different Age: Americans of the Progressive Era'' (1998) [https://www.amazon.com/Very-Different-Age-Americans-Progressive/dp/0809025531/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634565&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Flanagan, Maureen. ''America Reformed: Progressives and Progressivisms, 1890s-1920s'' (2007). | | * Flanagan, Maureen. ''America Reformed: Progressives and Progressivisms, 1890s-1920s'' (2007). |
| | * Gilmore, Glenda Elizabeth. ''Who Were the Progressives?'' (2002) | | * Gilmore, Glenda Elizabeth. ''Who Were the Progressives?'' (2002) |
| − | * Gould Lewis L. ''America in the Progressive Era, 1890-1914" (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/America-Progressive-Era-1890-Seminar/dp/0582356717/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634595&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Gould Lewis L. ''America in the Progressive Era, 1890-1914" (2000) [https://www.amazon.com/America-Progressive-Era-1890-Seminar/dp/0582356717/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634595&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Gould Lewis L. ed., ''The Progressive Era'' (1974), essays by scholars | | * Gould Lewis L. ed., ''The Progressive Era'' (1974), essays by scholars |
| | * Hays, Samuel P. ''The Response to Industrialism, 1885-1914'' (1957), old but influential short survey | | * Hays, Samuel P. ''The Response to Industrialism, 1885-1914'' (1957), old but influential short survey |
| Line 166: |
Line 186: |
| | * Link, Arthur S. ''Wilson: The Road to the White House'' (1947), first volume of standard biography (to 1917); ''Wilson: The New Freedom'' (1956); ''Wilson: The Struggle for Neutrality: 1914-1915'' (1960); ''Wilson: Confusions and Crises: 1915-1916'' (1964); ''Wilson: Campaigns for Progressivism and Peace: 1916-1917'' (1965), the last volume of standard biography. [http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb01547 all 5 volumes are online free (if you have a account) at ACLS e-books] | | * Link, Arthur S. ''Wilson: The Road to the White House'' (1947), first volume of standard biography (to 1917); ''Wilson: The New Freedom'' (1956); ''Wilson: The Struggle for Neutrality: 1914-1915'' (1960); ''Wilson: Confusions and Crises: 1915-1916'' (1964); ''Wilson: Campaigns for Progressivism and Peace: 1916-1917'' (1965), the last volume of standard biography. [http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb01547 all 5 volumes are online free (if you have a account) at ACLS e-books] |
| | * Mann, Arthur. ed., ''The Progressive Era'' (1975), readings from scholars | | * Mann, Arthur. ed., ''The Progressive Era'' (1975), readings from scholars |
| − | * Lasch, Christopher. ''The True and Only Heaven: Progress and its Critics'' (1991) [http://www.amazon.com/True-Only-Heaven-Progress-Critics/dp/0393307956/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634634&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Lasch, Christopher. ''The True and Only Heaven: Progress and its Critics'' (1991) [https://www.amazon.com/True-Only-Heaven-Progress-Critics/dp/0393307956/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634634&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| | * McGerr, Michael. ''A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America, 1870-1920'' (2003) | | * McGerr, Michael. ''A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America, 1870-1920'' (2003) |
| | *Mowry, George. ''The Era of Theodore Roosevelt and the Birth of Modern America, 1900-1912.'' (1954) general survey of era | | *Mowry, George. ''The Era of Theodore Roosevelt and the Birth of Modern America, 1900-1912.'' (1954) general survey of era |
| − | * Noggle, Burl. "The Twenties: A New Historiographical Frontier," ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 53, No. 2. (Sep., 1966), pp. 299-314. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723%28196609%2953%3A2%3C299%3ATTANHF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y in JSTOR] | + | * [[Burl Noggle|Noggle, Burl]]. "The Twenties: A New Historiographical Frontier," ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 53, No. 2. (Sep., 1966), pp. 299-314. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723%28196609%2953%3A2%3C299%3ATTANHF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y in JSTOR] |
| | * Perry, Elisabeth Israels and Karen Manners Smith, eds. ''The Gilded Age & Progressive Era: A Student Companion'' (2006) | | * Perry, Elisabeth Israels and Karen Manners Smith, eds. ''The Gilded Age & Progressive Era: A Student Companion'' (2006) |
| | * Piott, Steven. ''American Reformers 1870-1920'' (2006). 240 pp. biographies of 12 leaders [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.php?id=24927 online review] | | * Piott, Steven. ''American Reformers 1870-1920'' (2006). 240 pp. biographies of 12 leaders [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.php?id=24927 online review] |
| Line 178: |
Line 198: |
| | *Blum, John Morton ''The Republican Roosevelt.'' (1954). Series of essays that examine how TR did politics | | *Blum, John Morton ''The Republican Roosevelt.'' (1954). Series of essays that examine how TR did politics |
| | *Brands, H.W. ''Theodore Roosevelt'' (2001), biography [http://www.questia.com/library/book/t-r-the-last-romantic-by-h-w-brands.jsp online edition] | | *Brands, H.W. ''Theodore Roosevelt'' (2001), biography [http://www.questia.com/library/book/t-r-the-last-romantic-by-h-w-brands.jsp online edition] |
| − | * Clements, Kendrick A. ''The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson'' (1992) [http://www.amazon.com/Presidency-Woodrow-Wilson-Kendrick-Clements/dp/070060524X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634763&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Clements, Kendrick A. ''The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson'' (1992) [https://www.amazon.com/Presidency-Woodrow-Wilson-Kendrick-Clements/dp/070060524X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634763&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Coletta, Paolo. ''The Presidency of William Howard Taft'' (1990) [http://www.amazon.com/Presidency-William-Howard-Taft-American/dp/0700600965/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634782&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Coletta, Paolo. ''The Presidency of William Howard Taft'' (1990) [https://www.amazon.com/Presidency-William-Howard-Taft-American/dp/0700600965/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634782&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Cooper, John Milton ''The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1983), influential dual biography [http://www.amazon.com/Warrior-Priest-Woodrow-Theodore-Roosevelt/dp/0674947517/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634808&sr=8-2 excerpt and text search] | + | * Cooper, John Milton ''The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1983), influential dual biography [https://www.amazon.com/Warrior-Priest-Woodrow-Theodore-Roosevelt/dp/0674947517/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634808&sr=8-2 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Gould, Lewis L. ''The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt'' (1991) [http://www.amazon.com/Presidency-Theodore-Roosevelt-American/dp/0700605657/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634966&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Gould, Lewis L. ''The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt'' (1991) [https://www.amazon.com/Presidency-Theodore-Roosevelt-American/dp/0700605657/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634966&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Harbaugh, William Henry. ''The Life and Times of Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1963); also titled "Power and Responsibility''; very good political biography [http://www.amazon.com/Power-Responsibility-William-Henry-Harbaugh/dp/0945707134/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635034&sr=8-5 excerpt and text search] | + | * Harbaugh, William Henry. ''The Life and Times of Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1963); also titled "Power and Responsibility''; very good political biography [https://www.amazon.com/Power-Responsibility-William-Henry-Harbaugh/dp/0945707134/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635034&sr=8-5 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Harrison, Robert. ''Congress, Progressive Reform, and the New American State'' (2004) [http://www.amazon.com/Congress-Progressive-Reform-American-State/dp/0521827892/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635083&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Harrison, Robert. ''Congress, Progressive Reform, and the New American State'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Congress-Progressive-Reform-American-State/dp/0521827892/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635083&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Hofstadter, Richard. ''The American Political Tradition'' (1948), ch. 8-9-10 on Bryan, Roosevelt and Wilson. [http://www.amazon.com/American-Political-Tradition-Men-Made/dp/0679723153/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228139165&sr=8-2 excerpt and text search] | + | * Hofstadter, Richard. ''The American Political Tradition'' (1948), ch. 8-9-10 on Bryan, Roosevelt and Wilson. [https://www.amazon.com/American-Political-Tradition-Men-Made/dp/0679723153/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228139165&sr=8-2 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Link, Arthur Stanley. ''Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive Era, 1910-1917'' (1972), standard history | | * Link, Arthur Stanley. ''Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive Era, 1910-1917'' (1972), standard history |
| − | * Morris, Edmund ''Theodore Rex''. (2001), very well written biography of Theodore Roosevelt covers 1901-1909 [http://www.amazon.com/Theodore-Rex-Modern-Library-Paperbacks/dp/0812966007/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634966&sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] | + | * Morris, Edmund ''Theodore Rex''. (2001), very well written biography of Theodore Roosevelt covers 1901-1909 [https://www.amazon.com/Theodore-Rex-Modern-Library-Paperbacks/dp/0812966007/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196634966&sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Mowry, George E. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement''. (2001) standard history of 1912 movement | | * Mowry, George E. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement''. (2001) standard history of 1912 movement |
| − | * Sanders, Elizabeth. ''Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers and the American State, 1877-1917'' (1999) [http://www.amazon.com/Roots-Reform-American-1877-1917-Political/dp/0226734773/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635183&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | * Sanders, Elizabeth. ''Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers and the American State, 1877-1917'' (1999) [https://www.amazon.com/Roots-Reform-American-1877-1917-Political/dp/0226734773/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635183&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Wilson, Joan Hoff. ''Herbert Hoover, Forgotten Progressive'' (1965), favorable to Hoover | | * Wilson, Joan Hoff. ''Herbert Hoover, Forgotten Progressive'' (1965), favorable to Hoover |
| | | | |
| Line 194: |
Line 214: |
| | * Campbell, Ballard. "Economic Causes of Progressivism." ''Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era'' 2005 4(1): 7-22 | | * Campbell, Ballard. "Economic Causes of Progressivism." ''Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era'' 2005 4(1): 7-22 |
| | * Glad, Paul W. "Progressives and the Business Culture of the 1920s," ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 53, No. 1. (Jun., 1966), pp. 75-89. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723%28196606%2953%3A1%3C75%3APATBCO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R in JSTOR] | | * Glad, Paul W. "Progressives and the Business Culture of the 1920s," ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 53, No. 1. (Jun., 1966), pp. 75-89. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723%28196606%2953%3A1%3C75%3APATBCO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R in JSTOR] |
| − | * Kolko, Gabriel. "The Triumph of Conservatism" (1963), New left attack on Progressive reforms as dictated by big business | + | * [[Gabriel Kolko|Kolko, Gabriel]]. "The Triumph of Conservatism" (1963), New left attack on Progressive reforms as dictated by big business |
| | * Kyle, Bruce and Chris Nyland; "Scientific Management, Institutionalism, and Business Stabilization: 1903-1923" ''Journal of Economic Issues'', Vol. 35, 2001 | | * Kyle, Bruce and Chris Nyland; "Scientific Management, Institutionalism, and Business Stabilization: 1903-1923" ''Journal of Economic Issues'', Vol. 35, 2001 |
| | * Mink, Gwendolyn. ''Old Labor and New Immigrants in American Political Development: Union, Party, and State, 1875–1920'' (1986); unions tried to restrict immigration because it lowered wage levels | | * Mink, Gwendolyn. ''Old Labor and New Immigrants in American Political Development: Union, Party, and State, 1875–1920'' (1986); unions tried to restrict immigration because it lowered wage levels |
| Line 209: |
Line 229: |
| | * Buenker, John D. ''The Progressive Era, 1893-1914'' (1998), in the stronghold of Wisconsin | | * Buenker, John D. ''The Progressive Era, 1893-1914'' (1998), in the stronghold of Wisconsin |
| | * Feffer, Andrew. ''The Chicago Pragmatists and American Progressivism'' (1993), ideas of [[John Dewey]] and other philosophers | | * Feffer, Andrew. ''The Chicago Pragmatists and American Progressivism'' (1993), ideas of [[John Dewey]] and other philosophers |
| − | *Frankel, Noralee and Nancy S. Dye, eds. ''Gender, Class, Race, and Reform in the Progressive Era'' (1991). [http://www.amazon.com/Gender-Class-Race-Reform-Progressive/dp/0813108411/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635306&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] | + | *Frankel, Noralee and Nancy S. Dye, eds. ''Gender, Class, Race, and Reform in the Progressive Era'' (1991). [https://www.amazon.com/Gender-Class-Race-Reform-Progressive/dp/0813108411/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635306&sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Harlan, Louis R. ''Booker T. Washington'' (2 vol 1973, 1986); Pulitzer prize [http://www.amazon.com/Booker-T-Washington-1901-1915-Paperbacks/dp/0195042298/ref=pd_sim_b_title_5 excerpt and text search] | + | * Harlan, Louis R. ''Booker T. Washington'' (2 vol 1973, 1986); Pulitzer prize [https://www.amazon.com/Booker-T-Washington-1901-1915-Paperbacks/dp/0195042298/ref=pd_sim_b_title_5 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Huthmacher, J. Joseph "Urban Liberalism and the Age of Reform" ''Mississippi Valley Historical Review'' 49 (1962): 231-241, [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0161-391X%28196209%2949%3A2%3C231%3AULATAO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X in JSTOR]; emphasized urban, ethnic, working class support for reform | | * Huthmacher, J. Joseph "Urban Liberalism and the Age of Reform" ''Mississippi Valley Historical Review'' 49 (1962): 231-241, [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0161-391X%28196209%2949%3A2%3C231%3AULATAO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X in JSTOR]; emphasized urban, ethnic, working class support for reform |
| | * Lewis, David L. ''W.E.B. Du Bois: Biography of a Race: 1868-1919'' (1993), 2 vol; Pulitzer Prize | | * Lewis, David L. ''W.E.B. Du Bois: Biography of a Race: 1868-1919'' (1993), 2 vol; Pulitzer Prize |
| | * Link, William A. ''The Paradox of Southern Progressivism, 1880-1930'' (1997). | | * Link, William A. ''The Paradox of Southern Progressivism, 1880-1930'' (1997). |
| | * Lubove, Roy. ''The Progressives and the Slums: Tenement House Reform in New York City, 1890-1917'' Greenwood Press: 1974. | | * Lubove, Roy. ''The Progressives and the Slums: Tenement House Reform in New York City, 1890-1917'' Greenwood Press: 1974. |
| − | * Nasaw, David. ''The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst'' (2001) [http://www.amazon.com/Chief-Life-William-Randolph-Hearst/dp/0618154469/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635206&sr=8-14 excerpt and text search] | + | * Nasaw, David. ''The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst'' (2001) [https://www.amazon.com/Chief-Life-William-Randolph-Hearst/dp/0618154469/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1196635206&sr=8-14 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Rodgers, Daniel T. ''Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age'' (2000). influential study that stresses links with Europe [http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;q1=roosevelt;rgn=full%20text;view=toc;idno=heb00064.0001.001 online in ACLS e-books] | | * Rodgers, Daniel T. ''Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age'' (2000). influential study that stresses links with Europe [http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;q1=roosevelt;rgn=full%20text;view=toc;idno=heb00064.0001.001 online in ACLS e-books] |
| − | * Starr, Kevin. ''Inventing the Dream: California through the Progressive Era'' (1986) [http://www.amazon.com/Inventing-Dream-California-through-Progressive/dp/0195042344/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878072&sr=8-5 excerpt and text search] | + | * Starr, Kevin. ''Inventing the Dream: California through the Progressive Era'' (1986) [https://www.amazon.com/Inventing-Dream-California-through-Progressive/dp/0195042344/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878072&sr=8-5 excerpt and text search] |
| | * Thelen, David. ''The New Citizenship, Origins of Progressivism in Wisconsin, 1885-1900'' (1972). | | * Thelen, David. ''The New Citizenship, Origins of Progressivism in Wisconsin, 1885-1900'' (1972). |
| | * Wesser, Robert F. ''Charles Evans Hughes: politics and reform in New York, 1905-1910'' (1967). | | * Wesser, Robert F. ''Charles Evans Hughes: politics and reform in New York, 1905-1910'' (1967). |
| Line 227: |
Line 247: |
| | | | |
| | ===Primary sources=== | | ===Primary sources=== |
| − | * Burt, Elizabeth V., ed. ''The Progressive Era: Primary Documents on Events from 1890 to 1914'' (Debating Historical Issues in the Media of the Time) (2004) [http://www.amazon.com/Progressive-Era-Documents-Debating-Historical/dp/0313320977/ref=sr_1_29?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878274&sr=8-29 excerpt and text search] | + | * Burt, Elizabeth V., ed. ''The Progressive Era: Primary Documents on Events from 1890 to 1914'' (Debating Historical Issues in the Media of the Time) (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Progressive-Era-Documents-Debating-Historical/dp/0313320977/ref=sr_1_29?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878274&sr=8-29 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * Croly, Herbert David. ''The Promise of American Life'' (1909), highly influential manifesto [http://books.google.com/books?id=hUF4B1IopmgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:croly+date:1900-1916&num=30&as_brr=1 full text online] | + | * Croly, Herbert David. ''The Promise of American Life'' (1909), highly influential manifesto [https://books.google.com/books?id=hUF4B1IopmgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:croly+date:1900-1916&num=30&as_brr=1 full text online] |
| − | * Croly, Herbert David. ''Progressive Democracy'' (1914), theory [http://books.google.com/books?id=7QAAlVuOcOMC&pg=PA358&dq=intitle:progressive+date:1910-1916&num=30&as_brr=1#PPP15,M1 full text online] | + | * Croly, Herbert David. ''Progressive Democracy'' (1914), theory [https://books.google.com/books?id=7QAAlVuOcOMC&pg=PA358&dq=intitle:progressive+date:1910-1916&num=30&as_brr=1#PPP15,M1 full text online] |
| − | * Cronon, William and David Stradling, eds. ''Conservation in the Progressive Era: Classic Texts'' (2004) [http://www.amazon.com/Conservation-Progressive-Era-Weyerhaeuser-Environmental/dp/0295983752/ref=sr_1_17?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878274&sr=8-17 excerpt and text search] | + | * Cronon, William and David Stradling, eds. ''Conservation in the Progressive Era: Classic Texts'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Conservation-Progressive-Era-Weyerhaeuser-Environmental/dp/0295983752/ref=sr_1_17?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211878274&sr=8-17 excerpt and text search] |
| − | * De Witt, Benjamin P. ''The Progressive Movement'' (1915), a comprehensive contemporary history of the era [http://books.google.com/books?id=HP7FeEz_TBsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=intitle:progressive&num=30&as_brr=1 full text online] | + | * De Witt, Benjamin P. ''The Progressive Movement'' (1915), a comprehensive contemporary history of the era [https://books.google.com/books?id=HP7FeEz_TBsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=intitle:progressive&num=30&as_brr=1 full text online] |
| | * Pease, Otis, ed. ''The Progressive Years: The Spirit and Achievement of American Reform'' (1962), primary documents | | * Pease, Otis, ed. ''The Progressive Years: The Spirit and Achievement of American Reform'' (1962), primary documents |
| | | | |