Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
→top: clean up & uniformity
In '''''Schriro v. Summerlin''''', 542 U.S. 348 (2004), the [[Supreme Court]] held that ''[[Ring v. Arizona]]'', 536 U.S. 584 (2002), which extended Apprendi's jury trial requirement to the aggravating circumstances that make a defendant eligible for the death penalty, is not retroactive for other cases because deprivation of the jury trial right does not seriously diminish the accuracy of a criminal proceeding.
In '''''Schriro v. Summerlin''''', 542 U.S. 348 (2004), the [[Supreme Court]] held that ''[[Ring v. Arizona]]'', 536 U.S. 584 (2002), which extended Apprendi's jury trial requirement to the aggravating circumstances that make a defendant eligible for the death penalty, is not retroactive for other cases because deprivation of the jury trial right does not seriously diminish the accuracy of a criminal proceeding.
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]