Changes

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the idea of [[naturalistic evolution]] became the modern [[dogma]] of [[biology]]. Many scientists have found evidence of flaws in the traditional view that undirected mutations alone would add up to important organic differences such as an entirely [[genus]] (i.e., group of related [[species]]). Yet because of scientific dogmatism, they fear reprisals for publishing this evidence. They could lose positions, tenure, and even employment.  

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the idea of [[naturalistic evolution]] became the modern [[dogma]] of [[biology]]. Many scientists have found evidence of flaws in the traditional view that undirected mutations alone would add up to important organic differences such as an entirely [[genus]] (i.e., group of related [[species]]). Yet because of scientific dogmatism, they fear reprisals for publishing this evidence. They could lose positions, tenure, and even employment.  

<ref>Ruloff ... said he knew researchers, whom he would not name, who had studied cellular mechanisms and made findings “riddled with metaphysical implications” and suggestive of an intelligent designer. But they are afraid to report them, he said. [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/science/27expelled.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1] </ref> This is a serious risk for scholars who (unlike) Galileo are not independently wealthy.

<ref>Ruloff ... said he knew researchers, whom he would not name, who had studied cellular mechanisms and made findings “riddled with metaphysical implications” and suggestive of an intelligent designer. But they are afraid to report them, he said. [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/science/27expelled.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1]</ref> This is a serious risk for scholars who (unlike) Galileo are not independently wealthy.

==References==

==References==