Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback
19,788
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 151:
Line 151: +
→Psychosis in pre/early teens: sources
==Psychosis in pre/early teens==
==Psychosis in pre/early teens==
Pious, That's very interesting that even scientists admit what you posted! Do you by any chance have a source you can point to for that? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:10, 17 July 2016 (EDT)
Pious, That's very interesting that even scientists admit what you posted! Do you by any chance have a source you can point to for that? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:10, 17 July 2016 (EDT)
:EDIT: I did a little looking, and found that actually such reports are not hard to find. A couple I found are [https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/marijuana/there-link-between-marijuana-use-psychiatric-disorders] and [http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/schizophrenia/cannabis-psychosis-link] If you don't have a citable source, maybe we should use one of these for support. In general, any source of information you used while writing should be cited. If there is nothing to cite, it is a good idea to find a source which you can use to support your claim, especially if it is controversial. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:16, 17 July 2016 (EDT)