367
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 242:
Line 242: + +
→Popularity
Might I point out that Scientology is a very popular article at conservapedia, perhaps it would be a good idea to recruit more editors so that the article can reflect a consensus? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 00:37, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Might I point out that Scientology is a very popular article at conservapedia, perhaps it would be a good idea to recruit more editors so that the article can reflect a consensus? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 00:37, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:It's still not as popular as my user [[User:ColinR|page]]! :-P <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 00:52, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:It's still not as popular as my user [[User:ColinR|page]]! :-P <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 00:52, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Well, I think everyone knows popularity is not as important as "importance". The article was so deceptive as it was, I had to add to it a little. Everything is cited, except as noted, and most if it is from Scientology's own literature, so I am not sure what the problem is. Your page is very nice though, Colin.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 00:59, 25 April 2007 (EDT)