Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 501: Line 501:  
The new atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins thought he could thumb his nose at the medical experts and embroil himself in controversy at Twitter against the advice of the medical experts, but he was proved wrong (see: [[Richard Dawkins and medical science]]).  Unlike members of the best of the public, he had no real data to back up his position.  
 
The new atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins thought he could thumb his nose at the medical experts and embroil himself in controversy at Twitter against the advice of the medical experts, but he was proved wrong (see: [[Richard Dawkins and medical science]]).  Unlike members of the best of the public, he had no real data to back up his position.  
   −
Second. Dawkins flouted the advice of the Bible and did not love his wife and Christ loved the church. In addition, Dawkins ignored the advice relationship columnists around the world and decided he would do relationships his way - despite the fact that many of these columnist were ladies and therefore experts at relationships! Three failed marriages later and Dawkins is still not the best of the public when it comes to marriage. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:05, 20 July 2016 (EDT)
+
Second. Dawkins flouted the advice of the Bible and did not love his wife and Christ loved the church. He also ignored the Apostle Paul's advice about love given in 1 Corinthians 13:4-13.  In addition, Dawkins ignored the advice of relationship columnists around the world and decided he would do relationships his way - despite the fact that many of these columnist were ladies and therefore experts at relationships! Three failed marriages later and Dawkins is still not the best of the public when it comes to marriage. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:05, 20 July 2016 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910

edits

Navigation menu