SkipCaptcha
250
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 51:
Line 51: − + + +
Response.
I played Magic from 1997-c.2008 in paper form, and still play it for free online occasionally. As a heads-up, I'll be filling this page with my knowledge of such. I'm aware of its history (Dark Ritual, the pentagram on Unholy Strength, etc.), but since those days, Wizards has been bought out by Hasbro, which tries quite hard to be politically neutral for the most part. The lifting of the ban on Demons is something I disagree with, and I never did get along with their fabrications of what Angels are.
I played Magic from 1997-c.2008 in paper form, and still play it for free online occasionally. As a heads-up, I'll be filling this page with my knowledge of such. I'm aware of its history (Dark Ritual, the pentagram on Unholy Strength, etc.), but since those days, Wizards has been bought out by Hasbro, which tries quite hard to be politically neutral for the most part. The lifting of the ban on Demons is something I disagree with, and I never did get along with their fabrications of what Angels are.
There are also multiple versions of iconic/popular cards out there. I don't own anything with sacrilegious art, flavor text or names.--Pious (talk) 23:37, 22 July 2016 (CDT)
There are also multiple versions of iconic/popular cards out there. I don't own anything with sacrilegious art, flavor text or names. --Pious (talk) 23:37, 22 July 2016 (CDT)
:I'll look forward to reading your input! Once again, I know almost nothing about the topic, so I'll look forward to learning a bit about it. I would be leery of a game with a premise such as this, but it may be much more neutral now that it sounds, as you said. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:09, 23 July 2016 (EDT)
:I'll look forward to reading your input! Once again, I know almost nothing about the topic, so I'll look forward to learning a bit about it. I would be leery of a game with a premise such as this, but it may be much more neutral now that it sounds, as you said. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:09, 23 July 2016 (EDT)
::It's basically Hasbrow's cash cow now, so they try to remain neutral in order to maximize their demographic. Again, thanks for taking an interest in me! --Pious (talk) 00:15, 23 July 2016 (CDT)