11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 374:
Line 374: + +
User talk:Aschlafly/Archive17 (view source)
Revision as of 10:37, April 25, 2007
, 10:37, April 25, 2007→Abortion Article
:We do emphasize conciseness here. The [[abortion]] entry is already long enough. It sounds like your new work, if appropriate, would go under [[abortion procedure]]. Don't spend too much time on it though, because it may be rejected. Other entries that clearly meet our [[rules]] are needed more.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:27, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:We do emphasize conciseness here. The [[abortion]] entry is already long enough. It sounds like your new work, if appropriate, would go under [[abortion procedure]]. Don't spend too much time on it though, because it may be rejected. Other entries that clearly meet our [[rules]] are needed more.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:27, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:I think it's important if we're going to have an article on abortion, we should include how it's performed. I don't think it's any less appropriate than an article about Hiroshima linked to an article about how an atomic weapon works. Neither subject is pleasant, but we can't disinvent either and it's important to learn the responsibility and ethics that come with them. [[User:Kitsune|Kitsune]] 11:54, 25 April 2007 (GMT)