Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,330
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Category talk:Judicial Activism (view source)
Revision as of 14:27, July 28, 2016
, 14:27, July 28, 2016response to a very old question
Is it just me? or are al these examples of Judicial activism... shall we say... leaning a certain way... It seems as if every time they rule in favor of Conservatives it's a darn fine ruling, but if they rule liberal... It's an activist judge... What's the deal? [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|<sup>The Doctor is In</sup>]] 22:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
Is it just me? or are al these examples of Judicial activism... shall we say... leaning a certain way... It seems as if every time they rule in favor of Conservatives it's a darn fine ruling, but if they rule liberal... It's an activist judge... What's the deal? [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|<sup>The Doctor is In</sup>]] 22:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
:Being conservative is inherently the resistance to radical change, and the conservation of the principles already in place, which have worked so well. When a judge rules against conservative principles, they are also ruling against law, president, and culture. Instead of deciding what the law says, as s their job, they decide what the law ''should say'' (in their opinions) and rule based on their own preferences, rather than the law they are employed to uphold. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 10:27, 28 July 2016 (EDT)