Changes

This is sensationalist. “The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes — in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity.” If Hawking is correct, then black holes still exist, just not in the way previously thought. [[User:Darwon|Darwon]] 17:40, 14 December 2014 (EST)

This is sensationalist. “The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes — in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity.” If Hawking is correct, then black holes still exist, just not in the way previously thought. [[User:Darwon|Darwon]] 17:40, 14 December 2014 (EST)

== Created section. ==

== Why was this removed? ==

I was looking through the page history of this article, and I saw that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&diff=1139255&oldid=1139254 this] was removed a while ago with no explanation. This seems like a very good argument for ''Conservapedia proven right'', so I'm just curious why this was removed. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:32, 28 July 2016 (EDT)

I was looking through the page history of this article, and I saw that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&diff=1139255&oldid=1139254 this] was removed a while ago with no explanation. This seems like a very good argument for ''Conservapedia proven right'', so I'm just curious why this was removed. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:32, 28 July 2016 (EDT)