343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 231:
Line 231: − + + − By the way,, one of my edits is so far uncited, as I was not satisfied with the quality of any one source I referenced. If I cannot find a good cite for that, I'll have to take it down, so any help would be appreciated.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 00:48, 25 April 2007 (EDT)+
→New User: Comments about our editing policy
I'm sure you see where I'm going with this. First, edit responsibly by reading [[The Conservapedia Commandments]]. Second, your edits must be verifiable information. Third, cite your sources so that a reader of the article can learn more about what you are talking about. And welcome to Conservapedia.However, such editing is to be toward ariticles of a certain quality. John Smith could not become an editor and the wiki to place is opinion. This is exactly what JoyousUser has done, Joyous User has '''PLACED AN OPINION''' as an edit. This is what the wiki discourages, while encouraging editing. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 00:27, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
I'm sure you see where I'm going with this. First, edit responsibly by reading [[The Conservapedia Commandments]]. Second, your edits must be verifiable information. Third, cite your sources so that a reader of the article can learn more about what you are talking about. And welcome to Conservapedia.However, such editing is to be toward ariticles of a certain quality. John Smith could not become an editor and the wiki to place is opinion. This is exactly what JoyousUser has done, Joyous User has '''PLACED AN OPINION''' as an edit. This is what the wiki discourages, while encouraging editing. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 00:27, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::I think you failed to read my citations. Scientology's own site denies the power of Christian faith, and so-called Christians who claim to be scientologists will come back eventually. You seem to have a lot of unsupported opinions or some kind of agenda, or maybe I am reading you wrong. If so, I am very sorry.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 00:37, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::I think you failed to read my citations. Scientology's own site denies the power of Christian faith, and so-called Christians who claim to be scientologists will come back eventually. You seem to have a lot of unsupported opinions or some kind of agenda, or maybe I am reading you wrong. If so, I am very sorry.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 00:37, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:: At no point has Scientology ever made such a statement that "denies the power of (any) faith", and in fact I just finished a lecture series in which Hubbard addresses the power of faith. In fact, Hubbard uses Jesus' miricles as an example of faith. You are plain wrong and I know it. BUT, you are completely welcome to your opinion and if you will simply cite your facts, if you will reference your facts and smoothly insert them into the article then they can remain. But when you state your own opinion as if it were a fact, then it can not remain in the article. Where does "denial of the power of Christian faith" appear? What webiste says there, where does it say that, what phrase leads you to that? Is that simple enough for you? Where does that appear. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 10:04, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
By the way,, one of my edits is so far uncited, as I was not satisfied with the quality of any one source I referenced. If I cannot find a good cite for that, I'll have to take it down, so any help would be appreciated.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 00:48, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
: You can not place a conclusion which you personally hold on this article if it is your opinion alone. You are talking to 6.5 BILLION people Joy, can you dig it? Read your articles, do your reasearch, and then place known facts into the article. Especially where you have not studied the information that comprises the subject. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 10:04, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
==Popularity==
==Popularity==