589
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 68:
Line 68: + + +
Talk:Harvard abortion study (view source)
Revision as of 14:08, April 25, 2007
, 14:08, April 25, 2007→Opinions in article
: That's part of the spin, of course. If they reported that of 42 up front, then many informed readers would immediately react, "that's too young for most women to have developed breast cancer!" FYI, I found the age 42 in table 1. Murray, let me know if you need a copy. Your comments are good and I appreciate what you have to say.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:56, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
: That's part of the spin, of course. If they reported that of 42 up front, then many informed readers would immediately react, "that's too young for most women to have developed breast cancer!" FYI, I found the age 42 in table 1. Murray, let me know if you need a copy. Your comments are good and I appreciate what you have to say.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:56, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
For the sake of comparison, the Reuters report on this (I haven't seen the original article so am not sure if this is accurate) said: "Michels' team noted that the studies that had seemed to show abortion caused breast cancer also mostly looked at younger women who had not reached menopause."
::By the way Andy, thanks for your above comment. Much more data would probably be required for either of us to change our mind about the issue so that we agreed, but it's nice to discuss it calmly and rationally [[User:Murray|Murray]] 21:19, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
::By the way Andy, thanks for your above comment. Much more data would probably be required for either of us to change our mind about the issue so that we agreed, but it's nice to discuss it calmly and rationally [[User:Murray|Murray]] 21:19, 24 April 2007 (EDT)