343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 256:
Line 256: + + + +
→Popularity: response about issues raised in the article
::My point about the Xenu thing is not about the truths of your beliefs (although I obviously think you are deceived) but about the approach to quieting dissent. A real person of faith doesn't need to sue someone to prevent them from saying bad things about their faith; it is left up to God, and to human discussion.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 10:19, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::My point about the Xenu thing is not about the truths of your beliefs (although I obviously think you are deceived) but about the approach to quieting dissent. A real person of faith doesn't need to sue someone to prevent them from saying bad things about their faith; it is left up to God, and to human discussion.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 10:19, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Please listen to what I am saying to you. Scientology does not have BELEIFS. Therefore Xenu has nothing to say in the area. A real person of real faith may or may not have BELIEFS, scientology does not harbor BELIEFS as part of its FAITH, please understand this very very basic datum so we may proceed. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 10:41, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::As for your little syllogism problem, anyone who denies faith, and insists on "if it is true for you..." is inherently against Christianity, in fact denegrates the faith of the worlds Christians, who are willing to believe in the power of God through faith alone.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 10:23, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::As for your little syllogism problem, anyone who denies faith, and insists on "if it is true for you..." is inherently against Christianity, in fact denegrates the faith of the worlds Christians, who are willing to believe in the power of God through faith alone.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 10:23, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Yes, that's right. I have a little syllogism problem. A syllogism [http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=syllogism dictionary] is a conclusion that logically follows from two premises. "I know that apples are <font style="color: #019301;">'''green'''</font>" (if it is true for me, it is true as far as I know). "Jim believes that apples are <font style="color: #F62217;">'''red'''</font>" (Jim admits he has not seen every apple, but all the ones he has seen are red, he believes all are red). Now, what color are apples ? You state that Scientology's, "If it is true for you, then it is true" is in opposition to the very foundations of Christianity. I invite you to logically demonstrate that. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 10:41, 25 April 2007 (EDT)