80
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + +
no edit summary
"The link is nonsense" thats not much of an argument is it? The guy is a genious and is currently making thousands / millions because he points out where science is going wrong and none of the experts can give an answer to him. Can't you even answer one of his points? Arn't you even going to try? I think that proves my point. The first chapter of his book is avalible online for free [http://www.thefinaltheory.com/viewchapter.html here]. He points out that the current theortical framework is full of contradictions and paradoxes, for instance on Page 17 of the book (page 23 of the PDF file) he explains that Newtons law of gravity is incompatable with the law of conservation of energy, on page 20 (26 of pdf) he shows that the work function is a flawed concept. On page 30 / 36 he start to put forward his alturnative theorys which include a purley geometric explanation of gravity.
"The link is nonsense" thats not much of an argument is it? The guy is a genious and is currently making thousands / millions because he points out where science is going wrong and none of the experts can give an answer to him. Can't you even answer one of his points? Arn't you even going to try? I think that proves my point. The first chapter of his book is avalible online for free [http://www.thefinaltheory.com/viewchapter.html here]. He points out that the current theortical framework is full of contradictions and paradoxes, for instance on Page 17 of the book (page 23 of the PDF file) he explains that Newtons law of gravity is incompatable with the law of conservation of energy, on page 20 (26 of pdf) he shows that the work function is a flawed concept. On page 30 / 36 he start to put forward his alturnative theorys which include a purley geometric explanation of gravity.
The Science flaws section of his website highligts even more flaws in modern science [http://www.thefinaltheory.com/scienceflaws.html here] and he was links to articles in which scienctists admit that the don't have a clue how the world works [http://www.thefinaltheory.com/sciencearticles.html here]. Expalin that if you can [[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 12:19, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
The Science flaws section of his website highligts even more flaws in modern science [http://www.thefinaltheory.com/scienceflaws.html here] and he was links to articles in which scienctists admit that the don't have a clue how the world works [http://www.thefinaltheory.com/sciencearticles.html here]. Expalin that if you can [[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 12:19, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Geocentric theory may be a minority view but I am not the only one. There are others who think the same way as me, there is evidence to support our beliefs and so our views should be mentioned here. Here are a list of websites suppoerting geocentric theory: 1) [http://www.geocentricity.com/ geocentricity.com] 2) [http://www.fixedearth.com/ fixedearth.com] 3) [http://www.catholicintl.com/epologetics/articles/science/scicreed.htm Three] 4) [http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentricity-101-part-i.html Four]
[[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 12:38, 25 April 2007 (EDT)