343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 273:
Line 273: + + +
→Theory of Evolution article: responses to Tmtoulouse's comments about "sympathy"
A sympathetic and accurate description of the subject of the article is not a requirement of this site. Take a look at [[theory of evolution]]. Even with all of JoyousOne's edits in its still more sympathetic then it has to be. Remember this site has a strong Christian conservative bias and will approach articles that way. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 12:51, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
A sympathetic and accurate description of the subject of the article is not a requirement of this site. Take a look at [[theory of evolution]]. Even with all of JoyousOne's edits in its still more sympathetic then it has to be. Remember this site has a strong Christian conservative bias and will approach articles that way. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 12:51, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
: Sympathetic? Who said anything about sympathetic? Our editing rules are the [[The_Conservapedia_Commandments|7 commandments]], where does "sympathy" enter the discussion? Are there additional commandments, rules, guidelines or ariticles of special interest that only you have access to, [[User:Tmtoulouse]]? Our production is simple and you are introducing an unneeded, unwanted, undesireable complexity (my opinion) by raising the issue of "sympathetic and accurate". What are you talking about ? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 13:15, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
: Also worth noting, Tmtoulouse, your advice to [[User:JoyousOne]] might have been good advice for some articles, it gave Joyous a push into the fray that you yourself refuse to step into. You stand back from the article after editing early and push others into it. And then, JoyousOne, (of good will, but confused) had to ask [[User:Philip J. Rayment]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=prev&oldid=126829 editing difference] what they were doing that wasn't appropriate. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 13:15, 25 April 2007 (EDT)