Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 82:
Line 82: − +
Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 05:17, August 16, 2016
, 05:17, August 16, 2016clean up
#::: 42.94 ± 0.20 (Anderson et al., 1991)
#::: 42.94 ± 0.20 (Anderson et al., 1991)
#::: 43.13 ± 0.14 (Anderson et al., 1992)
#::: 43.13 ± 0.14 (Anderson et al., 1992)
#::: [Source: [http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9804/9804258v1.pdf Pijpers 2008]
#::: Source: [http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9804/9804258v1.pdf Pijpers 2008]
#:These error bars, and that of the relativity formula, all overlap.
#:These error bars, and that of the relativity formula, all overlap.
#:The formula for mechanics under general relativity is complicated, but it is not contrived or conformed. "Conformed" suggests that it was somehow adjusted or "tweaked" to match the 42.98 figure. The formula is
#:The formula for mechanics under general relativity is complicated, but it is not contrived or conformed. "Conformed" suggests that it was somehow adjusted or "tweaked" to match the 42.98 figure. The formula is